Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-16-2007, 01:35 PM
whoshotfirst whoshotfirst is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 82
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

I think a c/r is good idea here. Button could be betting weaker made hands on the flop, or even a draw.
[ QUOTE ]
as played i too fold the turn getting 5:1 and likely drawing to 5 outs(max)

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think we are drawing to 5 outs very often, it's either 3, or we are ahead against button, who could have 4/5 or more outs on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-16-2007, 01:37 PM
ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: THREE AM
Posts: 11,405
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

flop isnt terrible.

turn is ludicrous.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-16-2007, 02:09 PM
Fantam Fantam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 2,575
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

"Grunch"

This doesnt look right. How about raise the flop to improve your winning chances ?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-16-2007, 03:08 PM
akak akak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 214
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
i don't think i've seen a better flop c/r opportunity in a long time

[/ QUOTE ]

Yah, the c/r will most likely get more money in the pot when you're ahead, and you can be pretty sure you're beat if you get 3-bet.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:13 PM
Watkins Watkins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Back at work
Posts: 432
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

Xhad,

This is a semi-coordinated board as a result I think a c/r is your best bet here to knock out (or make it incorrect for) the weaker draws to play. Had the Q been a 2 I can see the benefit of a call.

I call down from the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-16-2007, 05:51 PM
bung bung is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: I\'m not a donkey, I\'m a horse.......
Posts: 726
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
PokerStars 0.25/0.50 Hold'em (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls, Button calls, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (5 SB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks, MP2 checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls, BB calls, MP2 calls, CO calls.

Turn: (5 BB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks, MP2 checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero folds

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't mind c/c in this small pot, though I probably lead. Even if it gets checked through, its not going to change much. Anyone with an oesd, was calling anyway, and I was going to show down tp.

I'm never folding the turn. Btn could be betting with so many hands here, small/middle pair QJ, KQ, J9s, JT, K9s....

I like a turn raise best.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-16-2007, 09:40 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
About the same percentage of the time I thought you were ahead on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that's a ridiculous assertion; yes, I realize that most if not all of these opponents are probably fish but three overcalls and villain betting again regardless still means something, even if all of them are terrible.

[ QUOTE ]
Also, since when was .25/.50 "nano"?

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess it's not. I started at 2/4 originally so I'm not used to playing this low; it's a good thing I don't think in terms of $$$ or this challenge I'm doing would never work. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

From an AIM convo I was having with babar about this hand:

[ QUOTE ]
(17:36:42) Xhad: it's like, in a 5-handed pot even if your opponents suck you ahve to start considering that it only takes ONE of them to beat you
(17:37:00) Xhad: so even if each individual would call with five high, the chances of all four opponents having five high is actually astronomical
(17:37:15) bbb: yea game theory
(17:37:18) bbb: but still, meh
(17:37:33) bbb: you can't be like okay aces, four opponents, i fold now to save suckout money
(17:38:04) Xhad: well, it's more like "how often does the one donk bluff into four people AND none of the other three are passively playing an ace?"
(17:38:29) bbb: yea
(17:39:51) Xhad: like even if I'm good 35% of the time against each individual, I still only win that pot less than 2% of the time (not taking into account draws)

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-17-2007, 02:15 AM
lautzutao lautzutao is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The road to Virtue
Posts: 1,844
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
i don't think i've seen a better flop c/r opportunity in a long time

[/ QUOTE ]

How much money is in the pot? tbh I think this is a terrible place for a C/R. Nobody is folding their ace, and this is going to end up being a split pot if you do manage to showdown more than likely. I call because I have a BDF, and only marginally so. I'd be sick to my stomach if someone C/R here if I DID call.

I don't hate the turn fold either for the same reasoning as above.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-17-2007, 05:22 AM
fretelöo fretelöo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,495
Default Re: [nano] TPNK large multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
(17:39:51) Xhad: like even if I'm good 35% of the time against each individual, I still only win that pot less than 2% of the time (not taking into account draws)

[/ QUOTE ]

The problem is, that giving yourself 35% equity in this pot on the flop against each of them individually is extremely conservative. You'd be good 35% the range for each of them would look like JJ+ AT+. If you give them some normal .25/.50 30vpip or so, you have 65-70% equity on the flop against each of them. That means you'll be good ~18% of the time, which is close to what you get on the flop. Thus, protecting your equity is paramount.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.