|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Two hands of interest
I played some 1/2 today and two hands came up that I found sort of interesting:
<font color="blue">Hand one</font> Poker Stars, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter BB: $206 UTG: $614 CO: $299.85 Hero (BTN): $199 SB: $211.75 Pre-Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN) 2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $6</font>, SB calls $5, BB folds Flop: ($14) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $9</font>, <font color="red">SB raises to $28</font>, Hero calls $19 Turn: ($70) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">SB bets $52</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $165 and is All-In</font> <font color="blue"> Now, this hand would be ultra-standard for me in my usual games. However, I believe I misplayed it vs a 19/15/2.5 200nl regular. </font> <font color="blue">Hand 2</font> Poker Stars, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter Hero (CO): $196 BTN: $213.15 SB: $211.10 BB: $439.70 UTG: $226 MP: $186.70 Pre-Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO) UTG folds, <font color="red">MP raises to $6</font>, Hero calls $6, 3 folds Flop: ($15) 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">MP bets $12</font>, Hero calls $12 Turn: ($39) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players) MP checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $26</font>, <font color="red">MP raises to $70</font>, Hero calls $44 River: ($179) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players) MP checks, Hero checks <font color="blue">In this hand I think villain recognized me from 2+2 and asked me why I called his raise on the turn (instead of shove/folding). I said that I was relatively WA/WB his range, and that his quick check followed by hesitation on the turn made air pretty likely. He felt that he could be semibluffing there a lot of the time.</font> What do you guys think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
Both hands seems fine. Hand one is definitely standard against a lot or 200 NL regs, you're basically behind one, maybe two hands. I agree with villain that hand two is a semibluff more often than air for a reg at 200 NL.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
First hand is fine.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think a SSNL nit c/r, leads with KQ or KJ there? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think a SSNL nit c/r, leads with KQ or KJ there? [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I think this is 33/QJs sometimes KTs/TT/air. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] Do you think a SSNL nit c/r, leads with KQ or KJ there? [/ QUOTE ] Nah, I think this is 33/QJs sometimes KTs/TT/air. [/ QUOTE ] How would you play K9 in my spot? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] really? what happened to baluga theorem? the only real draw is QJ, and it would be sort of crazy to lead out with QJ after you called flop raise, he shouldn't expect you to fold AK. why would he c/r KJ on this flop? AF of 2,5 is not THAT high. I'd say that hand one is a clear fold, but you're definitely better than I, so now i dono. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
hand 1 good.
hand 2, i think he rarely, if ever, checks a flush on the river. his line is weird. i think there is definitely value on the river, just dunno. i might pussy out and check but i think that shoving can definitely be viable. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] really? what happened to baluga theorem? the only real draw is QJ, and it would be sort of crazy to lead out with QJ after you called flop raise, he shouldn't expect you to fold AK. why would he c/r KJ on this flop? AF of 2,5 is not THAT high. I'd say that hand one is a clear fold, but you're definitely better than I, so now i dono. [/ QUOTE ] a. This isn't Baluga b. People do bluff/semibluff and generally don't like checking the turn after check raising the flop. His range of hands that beat us here is just so narrow. He may flat 33 and possibly kt pre but that is about it. TT probably 3 bets, kk 3 bets. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Two hands of interest
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] First hand is fine. [/ QUOTE ] really? what happened to baluga theorem? the only real draw is QJ, and it would be sort of crazy to lead out with QJ after you called flop raise, he shouldn't expect you to fold AK. why would he c/r KJ on this flop? AF of 2,5 is not THAT high. I'd say that hand one is a clear fold, but you're definitely better than I, so now i dono. [/ QUOTE ] IMO: a set is unlikely in hand one given that KK and TT would generally RR pf, and the only plausible 2Pair hand seems to be KT. This, along with a general tendency for players to overvalue their holdings against a button raiser, leans villain's range to worse 1Pair hands and bluffs/semibluffs. So hand 1 is a shove. |
|
|