|
|
#61
11-09-2007, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] read townsend's blog, he backed stinger for 1/3 of his action, and made 50k. [/ QUOTE ] if this is true, then effectively stinger was playing 200/400 [/ QUOTE ] A+++++ 
|
|
#62
11-09-2007, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
stinger only had 1/3 of his own action so technically it was 100/200
|
|
#63
11-09-2007, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] read townsend's blog, he backed stinger for 1/3 of his action, and made 50k. [/ QUOTE ] if this is true, then effectively stinger was playing 200/400 [/ QUOTE ] LOL, VVV good point [/ QUOTE ] Stinger posted on CR'ers that he only had 1/3rd of himself, so really he was playing 100/200
|
|
#64
11-09-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
Full Tilt Poker Game #4119875519: Table Ringer (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 15:22:03 ET - 2007/11/09
Seat 1: tie53 ($122,496) Seat 2: trex313 ($62,098.50) trex313 posts the small blind of $300 tie53 posts the big blind of $600 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** trex313 raises to $1,800 tie53 calls $1,200 *** FLOP *** [Jh 3d 3h] tie53 checks trex313 bets $2,800 tie53 calls $2,800 *** TURN *** [Jh 3d 3h] [6h] tie53 checks trex313 has 15 seconds left to act trex313 has requested TIME trex313 bets $6,800 tie53 has 15 seconds left to act tie53 calls $6,800 *** RIVER *** [Jh 3d 3h 6h] [Kh] tie53 has 15 seconds left to act tie53 bets $14,400 trex313 has 15 seconds left to act trex313 has requested TIME trex313 raises to $44,000 tie53 has 15 seconds left to act tie53 calls $29,600 *** SHOW DOWN *** trex313 shows [Js Jd] a full house, Jacks full of Threes tie53 mucks trex313 wins the pot ($110,799.50) with a full house, Jacks full of Threes *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $110,800 | Rake $0.50 Board: [Jh 3d 3h 6h Kh] Seat 1: tie53 (big blind) mucked Seat 2: trex313 (small blind) collected ($110,799.50) edit to remove ridiculous railbird chat
|
|
#65
11-09-2007, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
how big do you think the edge of the top high stakes players is on tie? What level could this guy probably beat online?
|
|
#66
11-09-2007, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
how big do you think the edge of the top high stakes players is on tie? What level could this guy probably beat online? [/ QUOTE ] 5/10 HU NL. He doesn't suck, but he's outclassed at nosebleed.
|
|
#67
11-09-2007, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] how big do you think the edge of the top high stakes players is on tie? What level could this guy probably beat online? [/ QUOTE ] 5/10 HU NL. He doesn't suck, but he's outclassed at nosebleed. [/ QUOTE ] You are not qualified to make this assesment.
|
|
#68
11-09-2007, 04:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] how big do you think the edge of the top high stakes players is on tie? What level could this guy probably beat online? [/ QUOTE ] 5/10 HU NL. He doesn't suck, but he's outclassed at nosebleed. [/ QUOTE ] You are not qualified to make this assesment. [/ QUOTE ] anyone with half a brain is qualified to assess that he's outclassed at NL60k. first part obv not.
|
|
#69
11-09-2007, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] how big do you think the edge of the top high stakes players is on tie? What level could this guy probably beat online? [/ QUOTE ] 5/10 HU NL. He doesn't suck, but he's outclassed at nosebleed. [/ QUOTE ] You are not qualified to make this assesment. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure? He reads HSNL...
|
|
#70
11-09-2007, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stinger is ABUSING Tie
[ QUOTE ]
You are not qualified to make this assesment. [/ QUOTE ]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
