|
|
#81
08-04-2007, 05:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
Sorry about the result but I agree with most of the responses that a shove is correct.
|
|
#82
08-04-2007, 05:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
I really think that if you don't have a read after 300+ hands then take your wins and leave the table. if you haven't noticed him staking off in huge pots with hands like top pair no kicker then just pick a better spot.
|
|
#83
08-04-2007, 05:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Your flop lead is too small, as is your 3bet. Overbet flop, as played raise $20 to $85. [/ QUOTE ] the flop lead is the pot.... [/ QUOTE ] sterling insight, ty [/ QUOTE ] well why the [censored] are you overbetting then? [/ QUOTE ] Because if they're calling $5, they're calling $12 with FDs, SDs, JX. I'd overbet the pot if I had QT here too. [/ QUOTE ] God I hope you wouldn't overbet this pot with both J9 and QT here.
|
|
#84
08-04-2007, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
so .... 44 or AA
good to push with money in middle and about equal chance of sucking out v 44 as AA has v J9 there
|
|
#85
08-04-2007, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] where are my results [/ QUOTE ] HE HAD 44 THEN I MEGA TILED. [/ QUOTE ] why tilt? that would be the biggest blunder of all
|
|
#86
08-04-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Call and laugh at his [censored] when he shows you AA. [/ QUOTE ] I shoved and cried when he flipped over 44. [/ QUOTE ] Wow so he was over 900 bb deep? Thats gotta be some kind of record.
|
|
#87
08-04-2007, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
My read is that if he had AA or KK, he'd shove. But he's using that re-raise button...hehe...
|
|
#88
08-04-2007, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Call and laugh at his [censored] when he shows you AA. [/ QUOTE ] I shoved and cried when he flipped over 44. [/ QUOTE ] oh i change my mind, i would insta-fold this. am i being results orientated? L o L
|
|
#89
08-04-2007, 06:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: This is so sickkkkkkkkk
[ QUOTE ]
Also, a lot of advice in this thread is disgusting, except for maybe overbet pot, but I think everyone assumes "OMG 80/0 he must not know ANYTHINGZ ABOUT THE POKERZ" and therefore lose a lot more money against them. Theres a reason besides running hot those guys run up massive stacks sometimes [/ QUOTE ] Whenever I see a guy like this with a big stack it's a combination of them running incredibely hot and people targeting him with super weak hands because they want to take the donkey's money before somebody else does. I wouldn't really consider top two super weak and would be happy to stack off here unless villain is just so passive he never does anything but call without this nuts. OP didnt give any sort of read to indicate that and villains stats suggest otherwise (3 af when he's playing 80% of his hands), so I'm still stacking off to this guy.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
