Biggest beat in the history of Party Poker - Page 4

shipitkthx · #31 11-09-2007, 07:28 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Is there a BBJ drop when there isn't enough players to qualify for the the Jackpot?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a really [censored] good question.

EDIT: And I believe the answer is no, because I don't see any BBJ rake in the original screenshot.

Grandezza · #32 11-09-2007, 07:29 PM

wow PP is so scummy. 4 players in the hand? seriously doesn't make any sense, it's just another way for them to steal our money.

shipitkthx · #33 11-09-2007, 07:31 PM

[ QUOTE ]
wow PP is so scummy. 4 players in the hand? seriously doesn't make any sense, it's just another way for them to steal our money.

[/ QUOTE ]

If there is no rake taken out, then it is fair, but still dumb.

JokersAttack · #34 11-09-2007, 07:32 PM

woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow...

reading that actually made me feel ill.

FoxInTheHenHouse · #35 11-09-2007, 07:32 PM

My nuts hurt just from reading this

shipitkthx · #36 11-09-2007, 07:32 PM

Confirmed that there is no BBJ drop with 3 or less players:

The jackpot contribution will only be collected if the hand is dealt on a jackpot table to four or more players and a rake is collected from the hand

http://www.partypoker.com/news/event...bad_beat2.html

rewt75 · #37 11-09-2007, 07:34 PM

wow...ouch

bring more russians on

shipitkthx · #38 11-09-2007, 07:37 PM

Also to everyone saying that its ridiculous that it doesn't pay for three players, think of it like this:

If they were to pay out on 3 players, they would have to drop for BBJ for 3 players. If they did that, that would be close to a full 1 ptbb/100 coming from each player in 3 handed games at 400nl.

gbporkpie · #39 11-09-2007, 07:38 PM

So gross. disgusting.

At least you have sick story to tell.

illegit · #40 11-09-2007, 07:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wow PP is so scummy. 4 players in the hand? seriously doesn't make any sense, it's just another way for them to steal our money.

[/ QUOTE ]

If there is no rake taken out, then it is fair, but still dumb.

[/ QUOTE ]
Meh. I'm sure it's in the terms and conditions, so therefore the players play BBJ tables at their own risk. But, if the game is actually being played 3 handed, then they shouldn't call it a BBJ table while the jackpot isn't live. There should be like a sign that says "BBJ active" that goes off on a table when all the conditions aren't met so players can stop playing at that table if they want.