|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which are you? | |||
| Catholic |
   
|
7 | 11.29% |
| Protestant |
  
|
10 | 16.13% |
| Latter Day Saints |
  
|
1 | 1.61% |
| Jewish |
  
|
3 | 4.84% |
| Agnostic/Atheist |
  
|
34 | 54.84% |
| Other |
  
|
7 | 11.29% |
| Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
09-06-2007, 04:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: some new titles in this NC thread are Re:ed way too much
[ QUOTE ]
With a board of 333AT you can not have 3s full of aces it would require either A3xx or AAxx on the hand to make 3s full of aces, and in both cases you would have either aces full of threes or quad 3s. You can have 3s full of anything but aces and Ts. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Like I'm paying that much attention to a "what's the winning hand in this LOLmaha-Hi hand?" post in the NC thread. Nits. |
|
|
Threaded Mode