What's largest stack you've ever seen on 2k NL table? <Low Content> - Page 3

KingNeo · #21 06-27-2006, 01:20 AM

I dont even know how it is possible to have a 63k stack on a 10/20 capped game.

I will NEVER have that much in my life.

samoleus · #22 06-27-2006, 01:24 AM

with my style, I can win or lose money in bunches. I don't think that a TAG or even a moderate LAG has the volatility that a player like me has. I have had 20K stacks many times. But I have also dropped 10K in 30 minutes several times.

yvesaint · #23 06-27-2006, 01:31 AM

still, 31 buyins is impressive. how long did it take you? its harder obviously on party because they kick you off the tables

samoleus · #24 06-27-2006, 01:33 AM

I played for 9 hours that day, but hit my peak about 8 hours in.

KingNeo · #25 06-27-2006, 01:43 AM

Very impressive.

samoleus · #26 06-27-2006, 01:48 AM

ty Neo. although it really made it easy when I kept flopping sets and hitting my draws over and over!

KingNeo · #27 06-27-2006, 02:21 AM

Yeah I would be such a better player if I could learn how to do that.

octop · #28 06-27-2006, 03:56 AM

Sam-
Youre dead on. Im a TAG in full ring NL games and my stacks will never approach those of a good LAG (or for that matter a donkey getting hit in the face with the deck.)Neither will my losses. Although a good LAG wins more money than me long term.

IHateCats · #29 06-28-2006, 12:36 AM

This didn't compete with that hand in terms of effective stacks, at one point there were two of us over 13k+ plus the ultra lag at 29k but he left when he had dropped close to 20k or so. What was impressive was how fast he built the stack, he went there from 2k in under 2 hours at a table with 3 of the other 6 seats with 25/50NL regular winning players and no real donk contributions from the other seats when they were filled with 5/10 players taking a shot at him.