#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
Seems at least the Sheep are at least intelligent enough to understand Card Domination.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
You are 15 days too late.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
Where do you play I would like to go heads up and test your theory, LOL. I see at least you are putting effort into thinking about the game so that is a good thing. I have to believe in the method of Pros, the ones who make a living at it.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
[ QUOTE ]
Let me show you an example, backed by a real life event. [/ QUOTE ] You're killing me. [ QUOTE ] My brother and I like to play heads up poker against one another... [/ QUOTE ] Do you ever play HU not against each other...like on the same side as each other? [ QUOTE ] So let's examine the final hand: [/ QUOTE ] The *final* hand. No more poker? [ QUOTE ] Why did he win? Here is the reason (and the basis of my hypothesis). I did not have numerical advantage. If you view the cards simply as numbers, then you will understand what I mean: 2-10 represent the numbers they are. Jack = 11 Queen = 12 King = 13 Ace = 14. To understand numerical advantage multiply the cards by each other. Thus; A*J = 154, 7*6 = 42, J*4 = 44, Q*K= 156. In that hand, I would've never won with AJ, despite the fact that Sklansky would consider hand to be dominant over QK. However, if I had QK, I would've won. AJ would've certainly beat J4, and 76 never had a chance against any of the other 3 hands described. This is because of numerical advantage. [/ QUOTE ] So, AQ (168) would have beaten KQ? Because here is where your theory may need some refinement. KQ (156) < AQ (168), yet, counter-intuitively, in the final hand, KQ would have prevailed despite the fact that AQ clearly enjoys the numerical advantage. Perhaps the sample size is too large. Look for a dollar from me shortly. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
[ QUOTE ]
... I left intentionally at 305th place. That's approximately top 3% of the players that entered, so something in my strategy/philosophy is correct and returning a positive expected value. [/ QUOTE ] This lends support to the luck and chaos part of your theory. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
yeah, opening up this forum so anyone can make an OP was a GREAT idea.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
[ QUOTE ]
yeah, opening up this forum so anyone can make an OP was a GREAT idea. [/ QUOTE ] Just pray we're being levelled and enjoy |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
Wow. it really takes balls to leave your name (youngdro i think) attached to a post like this... Im guessing this post was written as a joke. i shouldnt respond but i feel compelled to just because i will never get those precious minutes of my life back...
[censored] you youngdro you [censored] douchebag piece of [censored] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sklansky Hand Rankings Destroyed! >=)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] However, you must also recognize the existence of and believe in Randomness. (Chaos).. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, its existence is very apparent.. [ QUOTE ] (I am flat broke and having trouble depositing due to credit debt) [/ QUOTE ] I'm shocked! I'll deposit a dollar if I find out you've been leveling us though. If so, nh! [/ QUOTE ] shocked, why? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] and what do you mean 'leveling us'? you mean truthful? my bank account is negative 167 dollars, and my credit card has an outstanding balance of 344 dollars. I got screwed real bad by this company called www.creditlinegoldcard.com who called me up one morning and persuaded me to give them all my personal information (SS #, routing number, etc) promising a $2500 credit line, and they withdrew $100 from my bank account when i had like $10 in there so my bank charged overdraft fees and everything. I got scammed real bad. =( |
|
|