|
|
#23
08-07-2007, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: why 10/20 why
[ QUOTE ]
whats the proper way to read those graphs and how are they supposed to normally look [/ QUOTE ] Sklansky Bucks should = showdown winnings. The green total winnings can be anywhere as that includes hands that didn't show down. If you are weak tight, green will be the worst line, if you get ppl to fold a lot your green will be higher. 
|
|
#24
08-07-2007, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why 10/20 why
your a payoff wizard. ive seen about 30hrs of you at this stake. your 3x better and can win more at 5-10. but im gonna look like a dick for saying that right?
|
|
#25
08-07-2007, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why 10/20 why
[ QUOTE ]
your a payoff wizard. ive seen about 30hrs of you at this stake. your 3x better and can win more at 5-10. but im gonna look like a dick for saying that right? [/ QUOTE ] was this the last couple days or a few weeks ago? I did some very stupid [censored] a couple weeks ago, and i think with the exception of a few hands today and yesterday have been playing decently.
|
|
#28
08-07-2007, 10:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why 10/20 why
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] whats the proper way to read those graphs and how are they supposed to normally look [/ QUOTE ] Sklansky Bucks should = showdown winnings. The green total winnings can be anywhere as that includes hands that didn't show down. If you are weak tight, green will be the worst line, if you get ppl to fold a lot your green will be higher. [/ QUOTE ] this thing doesnt seem accurate at all then. is it supposed to be like some gigantic gimmick dick waving thing or what?
|
|
#29
08-07-2007, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why 10/20 why
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] whats the proper way to read those graphs and how are they supposed to normally look [/ QUOTE ] Sklansky Bucks should = showdown winnings. The green total winnings can be anywhere as that includes hands that didn't show down. If you are weak tight, green will be the worst line, if you get ppl to fold a lot your green will be higher. [/ QUOTE ] this thing doesnt seem accurate at all then. is it supposed to be like some gigantic gimmick dick waving thing or what? [/ QUOTE ] The expected total winnigns tab is actually decently accurate i think because it takes into account all those hands you win without showdown, etc, though I think it's still obviously far from a perfect program Like you can see in Skiier's last graph that he was losing anyway. It's easy to run "bad" when you're getting the money in bad to begin with
|
|
#30
08-07-2007, 10:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: why 10/20 why
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] whats the proper way to read those graphs and how are they supposed to normally look [/ QUOTE ] Sklansky Bucks should = showdown winnings. The green total winnings can be anywhere as that includes hands that didn't show down. If you are weak tight, green will be the worst line, if you get ppl to fold a lot your green will be higher. [/ QUOTE ] this thing doesnt seem accurate at all then. is it supposed to be like some gigantic gimmick dick waving thing or what? [/ QUOTE ] The expected total winnigns tab is actually decently accurate i think because it takes into account all those hands you win without showdown, etc, though I think it's still obviously far from a perfect program Like you can see in Skiier's last graph that he was losing anyway. It's easy to run "bad" when you're getting the money in bad to begin with [/ QUOTE ] oh comon, that's obv running bad. throw in 2 AKs running into KK (which happened), add a bad or tilty call, a set under set or some other cooler and things look different. running 8 buyins under equity is pretty significant.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
