|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
Each is in their 3rd year. Both follow guys who left the cupboard bare [1]. Both had great recruiting classes. But, the programs look like they are going in opposite directions.
What does all this mean? 1. Charlie seems to be pretty poor at developing the young guys. This is way different than the NFL 2. With kids you need a standard package. Trying to scheme each week won't work in college. I see ND play and they have like zero identity. 3. The Zooker isn't just a great recruiter (best in the country), he can develop his kids. 4. Maybe, just maybe, he's not as bad a coach as people think. I am thoroughly enjoying watching my lowly Illini look like a program on the rise while ND is a program going through a demise. Yeah, ND will be back, but Charlie sure seems like he's got some work to do before he really becomes what people hoped he'd be. [1] Yeah, ND had enough talent to go bowling during Charlie's first few years, but he didn't get hired because people were happy with the talent level in the program. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
[ QUOTE ]
[1] Yeah, ND had enough talent to go bowling during Charlie's first few years, but he didn't get hired because people were happy with the talent level in the program. [/ QUOTE ] Charlie's only two full recruiting classes have been outstanding. Talk to me in 2 years. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [1] Yeah, ND had enough talent to go bowling during Charlie's first few years, but he didn't get hired because people were happy with the talent level in the program. [/ QUOTE ] Charlie's only two full recruiting classes have been outstanding. Talk to me in 2 years. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] So have Zook's. Which are doing better? Zook better recruiter, and better developer of those recruits. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
the new orleans saints miss Zook.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [1] Yeah, ND had enough talent to go bowling during Charlie's first few years, but he didn't get hired because people were happy with the talent level in the program. [/ QUOTE ] Charlie's only two full recruiting classes have been outstanding. Talk to me in 2 years. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] So have Zook's. Which are doing better? Zook better recruiter, and better developer of those recruits. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly. Fat Charlie's recruiting classes have been good on paper, but it's translated into literally zero success on the football field this year. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
When he was w/ NE, I was in awe of Charlie's play-calling. I'd never seen anyone better, which was hard to see through my blind hatred of NE. Plus, he's a Jersey guy.
After watching ND for the last few years combined with the recent developments in NE, I don't know what to think about Charlie. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [1] Yeah, ND had enough talent to go bowling during Charlie's first few years, but he didn't get hired because people were happy with the talent level in the program. [/ QUOTE ] Charlie's only two full recruiting classes have been outstanding. Talk to me in 2 years. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Why wait? We can see those "outstanding" recruits NOW! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Wow, I really hate Clausen now DIAGF you clown |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ron Zook >>>> Charlie Weis
BigDaddy- It's not Ron Zook's fault he didn't have a Tyrone Willingham-caliber coach to stock the cupboard for him.
|
|
|