Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha/8
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:55 PM
I dunno I dunno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waiting for a hit and run
Posts: 494
Default Re: Simple Question

Is this some kind of punk the forum post? I thought you had a reputation for being LAG.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-22-2007, 12:34 AM
franknagaijr franknagaijr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wasting time on facebook
Posts: 618
Default Re: Simple Question

[ QUOTE ]
Is this some kind of punk the forum post? I thought you had a reputation for being LAG.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is clearly some ulterior motive. Trick question somehow?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2007, 05:30 PM
franknagaijr franknagaijr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wasting time on facebook
Posts: 618
Default Re: Simple Question

Is 64% 'crushed'? I'm still scratching my head. What has us in bigger trouble than these hands?

Kd Ks Ah 2d = 58%
Kd Ks Qh Jd = 64%
Kd Ts Qh Jd = 60%
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2007, 09:09 PM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: Simple Question

I never used the word crushed. I said dominated. You're off on your own adventure there.

My only point being that at certain tables, pot betting invites raises from hands that have us dominated. Compare this line to seeing a turn and trapping an unwary set holder. I'm all for being willing to get your money in, but there's no money to be made here against hands that raise us (these are the very hands that are also likely to pay us when we make a hand).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2007, 12:52 AM
I dunno I dunno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waiting for a hit and run
Posts: 494
Default Re: Simple Question

[ QUOTE ]
I never used the word crushed. I said dominated. You're off on your own adventure there.

My only point being that at certain tables, pot betting invites raises from hands that have us dominated. Compare this line to seeing a turn and trapping an unwary set holder. I'm all for being willing to get your money in, but there's no money to be made here against hands that raise us (these are the very hands that are also likely to pay us when we make a hand).

[/ QUOTE ]

So your saying you think the optimal way to play this hand is to bet half the pot, or something less than the pot, so you don't have to commit as much of your stack on the flop when you're beat?

You'd have to figure out how much fold equitly you are giving up by doing this and see if the value to be gained by keeping the pot smaller is great enough to make it your standard line. I don't think you can make that case.

Also, if you do that, then you either tip off your hand when you come out firing for the pot, or you have to bet less than the pot when you have a set so people have a harder time putting you on a hand.

If you raise the pot preflop, c-bet the pot on the flop, get raised by the pot, and call, you should still have enough left behind that when you hit the turn, a naked set isn't getting the right price to call. Most of the time you'll get called anyway though. Plus there a few cards where your equity goes up to 50% without actually making a hand on the turn.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.