IM ALL IN

[SilentNoise]

opening villain is a 25/20 tagreg 2p2er. 3bettor is on the slightly tighter side, 19/16. but seems to abuse his vpip/pfr by 3betting a healthy amount.

what do you think has more fold equity.. a small 4bet or a shove?

ps.. i haven't done anything on this table out of the ordinary. i was concentrating all my tilt anger on other tables instead.

Poker Stars, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

BTN: $899
Hero (SB): $211.05
BB: $189
UTG: $324.55
CO: $200

Pre-Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB)
UTG folds, <font color="red">CO raises to $8</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $24</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $211.05 and is All-In</font>

[ofishstix]

i think a smaller 3bet has more fold equity. i'd make it something like 70 because that's more how most people would be playing aa/kk. also, if you get 4bet all in, you can save a lil money.

[lsaw2]

meh if you're gonna do it do it however you play AA.

4bet to ~76$ fold to shove? Or meta game raise to 120$ call shove and suckout??

[higHstaKesOwneR]

[ QUOTE ]
i think a smaller 3bet has more fold equity. i'd make it something like 70 because that's more how most people would be playing aa/kk. also, if you get 4bet all in, you can save a lil money.

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah even if the fe is the same 4-betting smaller is still better and yes in my opinion going allin here don't looks that strong as making it to some like 70 bucks