|
|
#21
10-25-2007, 12:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
the dealer bobvigously
|
|
#22
10-25-2007, 12:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Youre being pretty short sighted if you think this site is a good thing. [/ QUOTE ] It's great for me. I don't know why you think it's so bad. Maybe it would be better if they didn't post a biggest losers list, but that's a small price to pay for such a fun database to use to call 2+2 exaggerators and wannabes out. [/ QUOTE ] You're a [censored] idiot. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#25
10-25-2007, 02:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
[ QUOTE ]
without accusing anybody of anything, this looks suspiciously like spam, so plz to be confirming that it's not [/ QUOTE ] Spam would be me advertising porn or Nokia phones, not me putting up a link of geniune interest to the poker-playing 2+2 community. A link to a site I'm not even affiliated with. Jesus Christ. To all the nay-sayers, I hear you. I'm willing to give it a chance and see where it goes, though. It's stats are wrong for me, but only by way of admission of hands. It appears to have recorded about 70% of the hands I've played since its inception. But, it appears to be less than a month old, so some bugs are to be expected.
|
|
#27
10-25-2007, 03:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is not the accuracy of the site. It could be 100% accurate for all i care. [/ QUOTE ] Is your problem with the site that the sky is falling?
|
|
#28
10-25-2007, 03:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
If OP can't understand why he'd be accused of spamming, it's a [censored] far reach to hope he can understand why a site like this would be against TOS.
|
|
#29
10-25-2007, 03:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: You\'re Grimstarr
My stats look very accurate, actually. I don't understand what peoples' problem with this site is, when others publicly talk about datamining and some even advertise their databases for sale.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
