Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:22 AM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

hero should never got air here anyway 0evg0. floating twice here sucks against agro opponents.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:24 AM
0evg0 0evg0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: mano a mano
Posts: 9,235
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

[ QUOTE ]
hero should never got air here anyway 0evg0. floating twice here sucks against agro opponents.

[/ QUOTE ]

you're allowed to bluff with pairs too

JX, QsTx, QxTs, 9sTx, Ts9x
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:24 AM
cs3 cs3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: the shallow end
Posts: 2,737
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

[ QUOTE ]
hero should never got air here anyway 0evg0. floating twice here sucks against agro opponents.


[/ QUOTE ]

exactly.
like i mentioned above, what complete air hands can i possibly have?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:29 AM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

hardly anyone at 100nl will turn Jx into a bluff here, villain would know that.

also, hardly any tag at 100nl would call with an off-suit connector to a raise, villain would know that too.



nvm missed their history.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:33 AM
cs3 cs3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: the shallow end
Posts: 2,737
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

why the hell would i EVVVER bluff with Jx here? so i can fold out exactly AA/QQ?
and how do i have any of the other hands you mention given PF? QsTx/TsQx??? my actual hand is like the bare bottom of my range in that position vs an UTG raise, even given our history.
but if i somehow did have one of those, calling the turn would be pretty bad with any of them, because i have really bad reverse implied odds vs higher flush draws/made boats/etc.


edit - Soldier beat me to it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-01-2007, 01:44 AM
cs3 cs3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: the shallow end
Posts: 2,737
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

anyway fo tthose hat care, villain timed down to 2, and finally slowrolled me with AK. i think he mustve been playing too many tables and just [censored] up with his river check, because i think he knows checking the river is really bad with the nuts here, when i can easily have a hand that will pay off a shove, but will almost NEVER bet myself with worse.

and i think if the turn was the K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] instead of [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] then i get looked up very often by like any 1 pair hand or better that he can have here... agree?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-01-2007, 02:08 AM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting rivered by idiots
Posts: 6,558
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

Grunch. I just retched. Sry I couldn't be more helpful but this is ugly from start to finish.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-01-2007, 04:57 AM
shpanko shpanko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mile High Club
Posts: 4,726
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

I don't like flop/turn but I think river shove is good. Only hand he'll check that might call and you'll lose to is JJ, he'll make some bad calls with other worse hands and I doubt he ever checks a K here.

I really don't see why people hate this shove tbh, I mean we're basically always ahead and we want to look bluffy so why not shove, I think a smaller bet looks more for value even if it does give him better odds.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-01-2007, 05:05 AM
Bukem_ Bukem_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,449
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

only read a couple of the notes you wrote, but i saw you saying call preflop is bad and flop call is standard.

My views are pretty much exact opposite of this.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-01-2007, 05:23 AM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: A river overbet shove vs a solid regular LAG

[ QUOTE ]
i thought the only way i would get ANY worse hands to pay me off is too look as fishy as possible, and i felt like i was almost always ahead here.


[/ QUOTE ]
The hand you actually called down to the river is not much better than air, it's at least a hand you could turn into a bluff on the river. Except you happened to hit the river. Given that you played 87s like this, it seems like you could play 99/77-22 the same way and turn them into a bluff on the river.

However, given history villain will/should probably bet Kx on the river. I like your push given history. All streets up until the river sucks though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.