#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
Skimmed it, saw talk about "rigged". Moving on to a better thread.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
This is prob a gimmick account trying to level.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
I don't understand someone who accepts and understands the non-riggedness of the online-game is classified as a 'degenerate'.
It seems this is the wrong insult. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
[ QUOTE ]
Computers dont generate the random numbers the 'random' element comes from a radioactive isotope contained within a small device that measures when the next electron is released which is 100% not predictable, Im fairly certain all current poker sites use this or at the minimum PS and FT do. These are very common and commercially available, Im surprised more people dont know this. [/ QUOTE ] Sweet. Build neutrino detector ---> profit |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
[ QUOTE ]
I guess you didn't read the "Before flamming" part... [/ QUOTE ] Before flamming. Is this like flim flamming? I always hated that Flim Flam character on the 13 ghosts of Scooby Doo. I don't know why Vincent Price never kicked his ass. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
Dear HensonlosesLots.
I am not going to flame because I see that you are a newbie and have only 28 posts. By now, if you have calmed down, you will have realized that any post on any poker forum that purports to claim one site is "more rigged" or "less random" will result in flame. This is because the idea that any one site produces more or less of any kind of result has been so seriously shot down so many times that to profess this opinion shows you have not read much on this subject and really have no basis for expressing that opinion. It has as much value to the rest of us as "I dont like the site 'cause I got a bad beat there." Nobody flamed your comments about the quality of service. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
[ QUOTE ]
any post on any poker forum that purports to claim one site is "more rigged" or "less random" will result in flame. [/ QUOTE ] not true. there are other forums where such types get-together to complain about which site is 'more rigged' than another. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
Definitely the wrong insult there..
Degeneracy has nothing to do with these flames, sir. Moran. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
I don't know why you all are giving the OP such a hard time. I thought it was common knowledge FTP is way more rigged than PS
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
My experience has been the opposite. I've done quite well on FT and have a rough time at Stars.
|
|
|