Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-19-2007, 03:58 PM
action44 action44 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 376
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

maybe he has a point it is IMPOSSIBLE for a computer to generate random numbers..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-19-2007, 03:59 PM
RoundGuy RoundGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Buying more VO, ldo
Posts: 1,932
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

F the haters, Henson. We all know the sites are rigged to some extent. The secret is the pattern mapper. Get it, and it won't matter anymore. Seriously, ask around.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:02 PM
DMoogle DMoogle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oakton, VA, USA
Posts: 2,462
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

[ QUOTE ]
maybe he has a point it is IMPOSSIBLE for a computer to generate random numbers..

[/ QUOTE ]
It's also "IMPOSSIBLE" for someone to generate random cards when they manually shuffle a deck of cards. Attaining a true "random" state is pretty damn hard, actually.

I'll trust a computer's randomly generated numbers over someone's shuffle almost always. Obviously there are exceptions, but it's much easier to cheat in a live poker room than an online poker room, except maybe when colluding.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:02 PM
RoundGuy RoundGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Buying more VO, ldo
Posts: 1,932
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

[ QUOTE ]
I just don't understand how you degenerates can take a completely innocent thread and turn it into a flamefest.

[/ QUOTE ]
You do know that this particular forum is called "The Zoo", right?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:06 PM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not trying to PROVE OR MAKE AN ARGUMENT FOR ANYTHING AS IT WOULD BE FOOLISH WITH NO STATS, IT'S A MERE OPINION FOR THOSE WHO SEEK IT.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's the problem.

You had me at "hello," but lost me at "rigged."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:10 PM
sanmarcosrun1 sanmarcosrun1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

I was under the impression that a degenerate title would fit you more since you are blaming a site for your loses and not your play. We dont want new people to the site to assume your opinion is anywhere close to accurate is why everyone creates a flamefest. But what live games are you playing in so we can find our way into those games since we dont want to have an online site produce an inaccurate result due to its randomness being less.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:11 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

Computers dont generate the random numbers the 'random' element comes from a radioactive isotope contained within a small device that measures when the next electron is released which is 100% not predictable, Im fairly certain all current poker sites use this or at the minimum PS and FT do. These are very common and commercially available, Im surprised more people dont know this.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:13 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

[ QUOTE ]
You guys prove how much of a gambling degenerate you really are. I make a post whole-heartedly trying to create a non-flame thread. I'm not trying to PROVE OR MAKE AN ARGUMENT FOR ANYTHING AS IT WOULD BE FOOLISH WITH NO STATS, IT'S A MERE OPINION FOR THOSE WHO SEEK IT. Making several notes that it's just a personal view and that I do not have stats to back it up. But I have over 3 years of experience of those two sites playing online (isn't that enough to form an opinion???). And even more playing live. I just don't understand how you degenerates can take a completely innocent thread and turn it into a flamefest. My congrats on doing so, it takes a true degenerate to do so. I hope I run into you guys in one of my cash games.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have an opinion too, can you guess it?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:16 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Intrepidly Reporting
Posts: 14,174
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

didn't read this thread, predict OP has a 'one or both sites are rigged' essay somewhere in it

edit: shockingly, I was right
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-19-2007, 04:17 PM
sanmarcosrun1 sanmarcosrun1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 741
Default Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +

So his next answer will be the radioactive isotope is rigged on Fulltilt.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.