|
|
|
|
#1
11-06-2007, 02:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ummm.... your reasoning here is so bizarre. Its illegal to have a prescription drug without a valid medical reason(obv). If you have a Dr. prescribing them without a valid medical reason he stands to lose his license quickly. So yeah it would be illegal to simply be prescribed these drugs for performance enhancing benefits, hence the point I was trying to make. [/ QUOTE ] What about a steroid that is not illegal, nor requires a prescription? To be quite honest, you're reasoning seems to be quite bizarre, in that you are assuming that the alleged substance was illegal by federal law at the time, and required a prescription. [/ QUOTE ] If you have no valid prescription for the drug it is illegal. How difficult is that? Federal law regarding control of substances has not substantially changed in the past 10 years. I have no clue why you think it has. 
|
|
#2
11-06-2007, 03:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
If you have no valid prescription for the drug it is illegal. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the drug is not illegal. This is what we are trying to explain to you, but you are refusing to understand. [ QUOTE ] Federal law regarding control of substances has not substantially changed in the past 10 years. I have no clue why you think it has. [/ QUOTE ] Probably because I rely on facts, instead of making them up. The FDA added 'the clear' to it's list of controlled substances October 28th, 2003. Boo-yah...
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
