#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
The regulars will always stay at FT for its rakeback deals. It's the fish who might lose their couple hundred and never play again.
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
Just my two cents but, I've played at Party, FTP, Stars, Paradise, Prima, UB, Poo Mountain, Absolute, Platinum and Poker Room.
These are some quotes I've read in chatboxes... "Only on Party.." "Typical Full Tilt BS..." "RIVERSTARS!!" "Paradise is rigged $#$#$$%&!" "Too many action flops on UB" etc etc etc Side Note: I hate all of those people and I hate the people that blame the dealers at live games for putting up an unfavorable card. Like Christopher Lloyd said in One Flew Over The Cickoo's Nest: "JUST PLAY THE GAME". |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
Wow, you should read some of this stuff.
In the "Winning Online Players" article it is proven (and by proven I mean stated without supporting evidence whatsoever) that the 2+2 forums are a big conspiracy and that some of us are paid $20/hr to post that we are winners so that others will flock to the poker sites. The books written by Sklansky... you guessed it, they are a part of the conspiracy, here to give the "illusion" that online poker is actually beatable. In conclusion, be suspect of the advice any mod/admin/person-with-high-post-count gives because it is entirely likely that they are here strictly to deceive you. Wow oh wow... I have to believe this site is a joke. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
[ QUOTE ]
OMG PROOF THAT YOU'RE RIGHT! [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] On this website I am going to expose ... I’m also going to explain ... I’m going to post ... Finally, I am going to talk about some sites where I feel the deal may be legitimate [/ QUOTE ] Eagerly waiting for the right site. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Seems like a some kind of advertisement. Either by an affiliate or directly by a new poker-site. |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
This thread is the funniest thing I've read here in months. It's a surprising breath of fresh air after all this UIGEA manure.
[ QUOTE ] I figured he had an over pair but whatever, I wanted to gamble. [/ QUOTE ] FTW! |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
[ QUOTE ]
Skall you an idiot in Mike the Mouth's words. You continue to put words in my mouth. I'm stating my opinion. It's obviously not useless information as I have many years of experience playing online. If someone who hasn't played much online and thinks my opinion has enlightened him, it's NOT USELESS. Opinions are not useless information, they are provided to help. FTP from playing on it for 3 years now, appears to ME that it somehow manages 5x more action flops than any other site. I'm sure your 'uptake in winnings on FTP' is due to your donk plays because FTP rewards idiots like you. [/ QUOTE ] Actually, anyone who says that your opinion is merely useless is being kind. It would actually be harmful to a newbie who was trying to learn online poker. They might mistake your uninformed, baseless opinion for something worth reading. As you may have gathered, if you are going to declare a major poker site as "less random" than appropriate, it will be met with a certain degree of skepticism. You apparently think that as long as you label it "opinion" its fine. You are correct, of course. Where you are wrong is in assuming that there's something inappropriate about you getting flamed for posting an idiotic opinion. You see, in the "great marketplace of ideas," yours belongs on the discount rack at K-Mart. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP vs STARS - My view of Both after 3 yrs +
Wow. Someone decided to dedicate a whole site to the big 'conspiracy'.
About that site: WAY WAY WAY tl;dr. |
|
|