Sklansky concedes religious debate o rly?

[jgallardo]

You're misinterpretting what Einstein said about God, and his defintion of God. Many of his quotes on God have been taken out of context by both/all sides.

For the record, I wouldn't just believe in God/Jesus/heaven/hell just to be able to hope that I'm right when it's all over, or just because it sounds nice. I'd rather believe in something that can be proven, or there is evidence for, rather than a false hope.

At the moment, not one religion has proven that there exists God(s) - I am an atheist. I have found my own beliefs in how things came to be through science and mathematics.

By the way, you'd probably be interested in reincarnation, with the logic that I'm guessing you're using to believe what you believe. Wouldn't it be nicer to come back and do it all over again, than to have a soul that just ends up in heaven. You'd take an eternal paradise it seems. Good luck getting in, just make sure you've met the cut!

If Sklansky did say what sheets accuses him of saying, then Sklansky is WAYYY wrong, and he would be an idiot to honestly feel that no one of Mr. Yang's religious devoutness could win the main event due to an inferior ability to reason critically. Nonsense!