Full Tilt Shortcuts - new ahk script

[Grunch]

Nano:

I don't know if you're already aware of this issue.

I have a shortcut assigned to set the bet size to a 100% PSB. This has always worked great, but it's now broken with the Beta version of FTP. When I use this shortcut with the Beta version of FTP, it sets the bet size to my entire stack instead os a PSB. When I go back to the release version of FTP, it works fine again.

This is the kind of thing that makes me realize just how crucial your software has become to me. Great job, sincerely.

BTW, I did dl and try the latest version of Shortcuts, to no avail. Both the new version and the previous version work in the exact same way.

[_dave_]

[ QUOTE ]

it's now broken with the Beta version of FTP.


[/ QUOTE ]

The beta uses different control names (well, FTCButton numbers) than the official client. Therefore any script working for the official client needs rewriting to work for the beta - and these numbers seem sto change with each build [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

A couple of days ago I re-coded BetPot to support the FTP beta, then it went offline, to be later replaced with a new version- I've not looked in to beta2 support yet.

BetPot uses ~6 controls in the FT client, and it required an If/Else for each access of each one of them to differentiate official from beta [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Nanochip's script here accesses nearly ALL the FT controls - I'd imagine it is more trouble than it's worth for him to add beta detection/support - especially with the announcement in IG that a new beta will be out in a week or two and it wil all have to be edited again [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

The FTP beta is awesome tho, I'll be a happy coder when testing is over and 1 resizeable version remains.

If I were Nanochip, I'd probably leave it until the beta becomes official, given the scope of this script.

dave.

[nanochip]

[ QUOTE ]
... This has always worked great, but it's now broken with the Beta version of FTP....

[/ QUOTE ]
Grunch:
Yes, unfortunately FT made many changes that prevents the current version of Shortcuts from working correctly with the new FT beta software (with resizeable tables).

It looks like a sizeable [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] job to convert Shortcuts to work with their new version, and I'm just coming off the major upgrade that I did a few weeks ago (meaning: I need some time to play poker [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]).

So I'll wait for their beta software to stabilize, and see what things look like.

I'm glad you like the software... thanks for the kind words.

nano

[SukitTrebek]

nanochip,

can you add a control for "check/call" so that it would check when the action is on you (or call when applicable). right now, i have to hit the "check/fold" control to check, but it's unsettling to be hitting the action i use for fold when i'm checking with a big hand intending to checkraise.

-trebek

[nanochip]

[ QUOTE ]
can you add a control for "check/call" so that it would check when the action is on you (or call when applicable). right now, i have to hit the "check/fold" control to check, but it's unsettling to be hitting the action i use for fold when i'm checking with a big hand intending to checkraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

trebek,
I have experienced that too...

With the new resizeable tables, I'm thinking of having just 3 keys to control the three buttons at the bottom (user could label them 1-2-3 or l-m-r for left-middle-right or whatever). So I could make the middle button press the call button if it is there (to call) and if not press the left one (for checking). This action would then match the pre-action checkboxes.

With the new version, these same three keys would control mucking, showing, posting BB, etc.

What do you think about this plan?
nano

[SukitTrebek]

that would definitely work for me.

[gswarriorfan]

sounds excellent nano

[nanochip]

Another design question for you Shortcuts users regarding the Full Tilt software with resizable tables :

Since I use image recognition to perform some tasks (like reading the player's stack sizes, and detecting some buttons), I am planning to have full functionality of Shortcuts at different 3 table sizes (many features will work at any table size, but some features will be limited to 3 sizes).

The three sizes that I have picked are

Large: 800 x 580 pixels

Medium: 640 x 400 pixels

Small: 535 x 400 pixels

On a standard laptop of 1280x800 pixels you would be able to put 1 large table, 4 medium tables, or 4 small tables.

On a 1600x1200 monitor you would be able to put 4 large tables, 6 medium tables, or 9 small tables.

On a large 1920x1600 monitor, you could put 4 large, 9 medium or 9 small tables.

(Note: I can't make the small tables any smaller than this, as the text becomes almost unreadable.)

What do you think of this scheme?

nano

[SukitTrebek]

sounds good. (6 medium tables x 2 monitors is heaven)

[unbendable]

Hi chip, can your software help to handle 4-6 tables - I mean just like Party does - table kind of blink when your have to do move.

Thanks