#1
|
|||
|
|||
common spot vs nit
villain: 19/9/0.7 (70h) (seems nitty ldo)
Pacific Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.5/$1 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $24.2 UTG+1: $95.5 Bub: $106.84 Button: $23.23 SB: $160.93 BB: $135.34 Pre-flop: (6 players) Bub is CO with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $5</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Bub raises to $17</font>, 4 folds, UTG+1 calls. Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($36.5, 2 players) UTG+1 checks, Bub....? what are your thoughts on 3betting vs calling him PF? what are your thoughts on Cbetting vs checking behind? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: common spot vs nit
3 bet pre standard
I would bet $25 on the flop - you are worried about QQ, JJ, but he folds TT, AK, AQ so I think a cbet is worth it heads up. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: common spot vs nit
3-bet is good i think, ur still ahead of his range (many nits opens spp from any position). In general I cbet all the 3-bets pots when they're containing a facecard and i'm the 3-bettor.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: common spot vs nit
3 bet pre is fine.
Flop: check 50% bet 50% depends a lot on the flow of the game |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: common spot vs nit
his range from utg prob is very tight although 70 hands is not that great a sample size.
the 3 bet seems good although i donīt mind a call b/c villainīs 3bet calling range is prob flipping vs you. As played i donīt really like a cbet here b/c villainīs stats look stationy. This means heīs goingto call a lot here. I just check behind b/c if villain goes crazy you know he mose likely does have a hand. you donīt want to bluff a calling station. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: common spot vs nit
3bet is fine, this is the board we want to cbet on, he folds AK/AQ/TT
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: common spot vs nit
who is the villain?
|
|
|