The Bax Limit Theorem

[NHFunkii]

meaningless is one thing, but if you think it means he's a losing player with any degree of confidence, you should take a stats class

lol at "leaking like a sieve"

[BadgerPro]

At the tourneys above $150 the players are better and therefor if you have an edge it is smaller. With a smaller edge it takes an even larger sample size for that edge to show.

Repost when Bax has 4000+ tourneys at $150+ buyins.

[timex]

[ QUOTE ]
meaningless is one thing, but if you think it means he's a losing player with any degree of confidence, you should take a stats class

lol at "leaking like a sieve"

[/ QUOTE ]

Thinly veiled beat?

[THAY3R]

If I never played a $150+ tourney on Stars I'd have so much more monies.

[ZJ123]

Id be a losing player at stars without $100+ buyins. yeah i suck

[BadgerPro]

[ QUOTE ]
If I never played a $150+ tourney on Stars I'd have so much more monies.

[/ QUOTE ]

[A_Junglen]

lol @ trying to comprehend the variance in mtts.

[TheNewf]

[ QUOTE ]


Repost when Bax has 40,000+ tourneys at $150+ buyins.

[/ QUOTE ]

Most Stars $150+ fields are enormous.

[ZJ123]

uhhh just checked the extended DB, Bax is up 11k in the 162 on stars.

LoL at OP



up 85k in the 11r WTF.

[jae686]

[ QUOTE ]
I played next to a higher-buyin tournament player at TurningStone today.

He was about 50 years old and is an experienced high-buyin expert.

He told me his secret was ALWAYS folding the first hand of a new level.

In fact, he stressed that if an opponent went allin with KK and showed him the first hand of a $1K tournament, he would gladly fold AA.

I mean, whats best case scenario? You double up... who cares!

LOL EXPERTS

[/ QUOTE ]

If you can somehow supply a more detailed description of this guy I would be soooooooooooo grateful.