|
|
#11
10-11-2007, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NLTRN - 88+4 - TPTK vs. Strong-Looking Shove
[ QUOTE ]
When he checked I was immediately worried about a set. [/ QUOTE ] Am I the only one that had a big WFT?! bubble above my head when they read this sentence? In what way does a chk behind in position imply a set in any form of the game, let alone HU? This is exactly why people should post their thought processes when posting hands, so little aberrations like this can be spotted. 
|
|
#12
10-11-2007, 12:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - 88+4 - TPTK vs. Strong-Looking Shove
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] When he checked I was immediately worried about a set. [/ QUOTE ] Am I the only one that had a big WFT?! bubble above my head when they read this sentence? In what way does a chk behind in position imply a set in any form of the game, let alone HU? This is exactly why people should post their thought processes when posting hands, so little aberrations like this can be spotted. [/ QUOTE ] The board was pretty dry and this was the first time I had seen him check instead of cbet. Skipping a cbet on a such a weak board seems shady to me, especially from someone who hasn't shown any signs of passivity yet.
|
|
#14
10-11-2007, 01:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - 88+4 - TPTK vs. Strong-Looking Shove
[ QUOTE ]
do you have a history of raising dry boards V him? - if so i'm fine with the flop check. [/ QUOTE ] I'm only 12 hands in with him, I've done it once. Wouldn't you want to check less often here if you have been raising more?
|
|
#15
10-11-2007, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - 88+4 - TPTK vs. Strong-Looking Shove
easy call
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
