#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $200 NL - River Value?
You don't think a T will pay off a raise to $35 hoping for a split?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $200 NL - River Value?
I think a T will most likely pay off but I don't really see villain check/overcalling the turn with an inside straight draw. In my opinion it is at least as likely that villain calls or reraises with a better hand as that hero gets called by a lesser hand.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $200 NL - River Value?
I just called because I figured there's no way I'd pay off a river raise with anything that lost to the KJ straight, but that's probably not the best thought process.
I basically never c-bet flops like that unless I have a read that the player's weak tight, which isn't all that common. People always seem to call with 89 or 66 or whatever |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $200 NL - River Value?
Oh, and thanks for the suggestions everyone :] I guess it's a good sign when opinion is divided that it's quite close either way, at least.
|
|
|