Training site videos...Should they get your consent?

[ikestoys]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They should have to recreate these situtations in a licensed replayer without names. But once poker is legal, the sites can go after Caby for IP theft.

[/ QUOTE ]

IP as in intellectual property? Filming something in the public domain is IP theft?

[/ QUOTE ]

lol salazaaar is a lawyer ldo

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They should have to recreate these situtations in a licensed replayer without names. But once poker is legal, the sites can go after Caby for IP theft.

[/ QUOTE ]

IP as in intellectual property? Filming something in the public domain is IP theft?

[/ QUOTE ]
So you're a legal scholar now? Do you know what is and isn't public domain, Fair Usage, press rights, trademark display law. I didn't say sites would win, just that they have a viable case because courts (not Daddy WB) must determine what is public domain.

[Daddy Warbucks]

Haven't you already decided that TC is violating intellectual property theft?

SALAZAAAAARRRRRRR!

[DefiNe]

wow Salazar you're such a dumbass
the person being filmed couldn't do [censored]
FTP/Stars on the other hand..

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
wow Salazar you're such a dumbass
the person being filmed couldn't do [censored]
FTP/Stars on the other hand..

[/ QUOTE ]

If you read my post, you'll see I said the SITES could go after TC

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They should have to recreate these situtations in a licensed replayer without names. But once poker is legal, the sites can go after Caby for IP theft.

[/ QUOTE ]

IP as in intellectual property? Filming something in the public domain is IP theft?

[/ QUOTE ]
So you're a legal scholar now? Do you know what is and isn't public domain, Fair Usage, press rights, trademark display law. I didn't say sites would win, just that they have a viable case because courts (not Daddy WB) must determine what is public domain.

[/ QUOTE ]

can you read DWB?

[Daddy Warbucks]

Yes i can read.

[ QUOTE ]
Booked! But seriously, he is violating IP law.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently you think its not for the courts to decide, because you've already determined that he is indeed guilty.

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
Yes i can read.

[ QUOTE ]
Booked! But seriously, he is violating IP law.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently you think its not for the courts to decide, because you've already determined that he is indeed guilty.

[/ QUOTE ]
Which was a short joke post before I went into detail. This was also, not what you responed to.

Edit, I'm now ignoring u.

[p2fgf]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But once poker is legal, the sites can go after Caby for IP theft.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wanna bet $1k?

[/ QUOTE ]
Booked! But seriously, he is violating IP law.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you just booked a bet with me for $1000 that TC/Cardrunners is in violation of IP law? I want confirmation before this turns into another FuGu or w/e his name was situation.

[Orlando Salazar]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But once poker is legal, the sites can go after Caby for IP theft.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wanna bet $1k?

[/ QUOTE ]
Booked! But seriously, he is violating IP law.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you just booked a bet with me for $1000 that TC/Cardrunners is in violation of IP law?

[/ QUOTE ]
Uhh dude, it's a joke. If I wanna bet with someone, I'll pm them with escrow details and negotiate exact terms. If I wanna fk with a poster to get them to provide information i want but they aren't providing cause they violate the "Pics or it didn't happen" rule, I'll post here and say booked. Get it? If it's really valuable info, I may pay them anyway.