|
|
#21
11-20-2007, 05:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
[ QUOTE ]
I heard that 4% unanimously oppose this [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 
|
|
#23
11-20-2007, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
To keep it short:
This is long overdue. The forum is suffocating with irrelevant posters offering their take on already misapplied advice. We should probably make it NL2-NL50 (low) NL100+ (high) with the intention of going to three forums in the future: NL2-NL50, NL100-NL200, and NL400+
|
|
#24
11-20-2007, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
I agree it should be split. I post there occasionally and would be more inclined to post more if it was geared towards specific limits.
|
|
#25
11-20-2007, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
Full ring needs a split 100/200+ 100/200- lets do it.
|
|
#26
11-20-2007, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
[ QUOTE ]
We should probably make it NL2-NL50 (low) NL100+ (high) with the intention of going to three forums in the future: NL2-NL50, NL100-NL200, and NL400+ [/ QUOTE ] Seconded.
|
|
#27
11-20-2007, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
[ QUOTE ]
Why are you posting here? [/ QUOTE ] In short, this forum is labeled "About the Forums", and thus is for discussion of the many forums on 2+2. It is not titled "About the Forum" or "About the Full Ring Forum" in which case eviljeff's posting here could be viewed as a bit more puzzling. Your question does leave some ambiguity, though. Are you asking why eviljeff is posting here on 2+2? I imagine that, in general, it's due to the fact that he plays poker, although there are certainly 2+2ers that don't really play and like to be part of the community. You'd have to ask eviljeff what his particular reason is. If your question is rather "why are you posting here?" in a more existential sense - for example, "why are you posting on Planet Earth" - we may have to turn to Robert Mayshaque and hope someone can complete his unfinished 104-man onslaught to answer such musings on existence.
|
|
#28
11-20-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I rarely give any advice in the strat part of the forum as it is too hard to wade through the many UNL posters and the bad advice. [/ QUOTE ] That's basically what keeps me from posting there too. [/ QUOTE ] Well, that and the laws of physics. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure this is an insult but I can't figure it out so you're off the hook.
|
|
#29
11-20-2007, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Well, that and the laws of physics. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure this is an insult but I can't figure it out so you're off the hook. [/ QUOTE ] I think he's talking about the restriction that you can't be in two places at once. since you are seemingly always somewhere on 2p2 other than FR, you can never be in FR.
|
|
#30
11-20-2007, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Full Ring No-Limit Forum now unanimously requests a split.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] We should probably make it NL2-NL50 (low) NL100+ (high) with the intention of going to three forums in the future: NL2-NL50, NL100-NL200, and NL400+ [/ QUOTE ] Seconded. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I think the best split would be 100+ and 50- for these reasons.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
