|
|
#31
11-14-2007, 12:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ v delta_k
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Orange, seriously, if you posted this cuz of something delta_k said, you already know the answer right ? Probably the opposite of whatever he said [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. Ie - this is totally std, pre and post [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] no, as i stated in cheese, i thought that i played this fine (i think?). he babbled in chat how 'there are so many things he could have said about how wrong i played it, etc'. anyways he folded and i win. ty for replies. edit, he also said 'thats respect right there. there isn't any way you do this without 777'. [/ QUOTE ] umm DUCY this means you played the hand poorly? 
|
|
#34
11-14-2007, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ v delta_k
eh...i forgot to mention that he's opened and i 3-bet twice this session and he's folded. by all means 3-betting pf/betting flop is std, i decided to do something different v. a reg this time. i also think that calling the flop is an option, but i really expect him to call the flop shove w. stuff like TT (if he so chooses to take this line with it).
|
|
#35
11-14-2007, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: QQ v delta_k
[ QUOTE ]
eh...i forgot to mention that he's opened and i 3-bet twice this session and he's folded. by all means 3-betting pf/betting flop is std, i decided to do something different v. a reg this time. i also think that calling the flop is an option, but i really expect him to call the flop shove w. stuff like TT (if he so chooses to take this line with it). [/ QUOTE ] seems like your expecting delta_k to be on the third level here when it would be more profitable to keep it simple. I understand that you want to mix it up against a good reg, but I'd rather mix it up with a bluff/semibluff and frustrate him into giving me money in the simple situations.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
