Not So Weird Pre-Flop Spot

[private joker]

[ QUOTE ]
i dont get it. did you fold your post? wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he means the hijack posted and folded and smoked.

[goofball]

You forgot: raise because raising is fun.

[andyfox]

Hijack posted and folded by mistake; I was in the cut-off.

[The DaveR]

He's raising any 2 after you fold but he has some restraint when you open.

[Michael Davis]

Limp reraise.

-Michael

[Heisenb3rg]

If you think he's re-raising almost any two you have an easy PF cap with tons of post flop fold equity in a huge pot. Unless you think he can outlevel you this high.. Then its close between a raise and a fold.

If you think hes only re-raising top 20% (still loose) you have a very profitable raise/call.

[Munchkin Mayor]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm in the cut-off and a famous, terrific playing, very tough and somewhat aggressive 2+2er is on my left on the button. Cut-off has posted after returning from a smoke. Folded to the cut-off who, forgetting he has posted, folds. The blinds are pretty tight and will defend less often than the average Commerce Joe.

I have Q-6s. Should I:

[/ QUOTE ]Take up fishing, because you are obv a fish!

[leo doc]

BTW: who was btn?

[Entity]

[ QUOTE ]
I would rather play this hand for 3 bets OOP to a very good player with 3 sb of dead money in the pot than not play it at all or play it 3 or 4 ways so I definitely raise here. I would raise worse too but the only hands I wonder about are like the worst ones, I think 32o could be profitable here but I'm less sure about it.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree with most of your post but I'd still raise here (i.e. I don't raise "most" of my hands here and I wouldn't rather play Q6s OOP to a 3bet in a bloated pot than fold it, but I still think you won't get 3bet often enough for this to turn into a gigantic issue).

Rob

[andyfox]

I folded. I hesitated a bit, which might well have telegraphed button that I didn't have a big hand.

Button raised and later told me that had I raised I was going to get 3-bet with just about anything he had--80% of time or more, even if I hadn't hesitated. I thought this would indeed be the case and I didn't want to be playing Q-6 out of position against a very tough opponent.

Michael Davis's limp-reraise proposal is intriguing. It still puts me in the position of playing Q-6 against a top opponent, but it sure would make him think he was up against a monster, especially given my image.