Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:29 AM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default 40-80 AQ hand

Curious to hear thoughts on all streets, and see how most of you guys would play it.

Soft 40-80 game at Foxwoods this weekend. New to table, but I could already tell it wasn't a tough crowd. A few decent players at best. I'm dealt A [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] in the sb. Three limpers, I complete, bb checks.

Flop Q95, two hearts. I check, a MP guy bets, CO raises, I make it 120, two folds, they both call.

Turn 3 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. I lead.

Thoughts? Standard?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:50 AM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

I think you should definitely raise pf.

otherwise I play it the same. but your hand is overepped now so you need to be prepared to fold to any further aggression, and either of these guys could have the hearts. but if they both call I'd just keep betting.

which day was this? I was playing on sunday.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2007, 10:58 AM
Hielko Hielko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,468
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

Raise preflop and I think I would just bet the flop, but a c/raise or check/3bet is also fine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:19 AM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

This is why I posted the hand; was curious to see if anyone would say raise pre. I think raising preflop is a HORRIBLE play here. You bloat the pot OOP with a poor multi-way hand that's guaranteed to be against four opponents. Even on a flop like this, if you raise pre and bet out, someone with K9s is getting odds to call, whereas they're not otherwise. Additionally, if the flop missed me, it was an easy c/f.

AQs is a better raise here, since it plays well multi-way. I'd mix it up with that hand, but raise AQo in that spot maybe 1% of the time at most. You make it so much easier for your opponents to play well if you raise here.

I was definitely planning to fold to a turn raise. The players in that hand didn't strike me as creative enough to raise turn with a hand I'm beating.

And this was Sunday; I started the game and played until it broke 4-5 hours later, I think, around 7. I was the guy with the Lord of the Rings card protector if you were there then.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:23 AM
The DaveR The DaveR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IMA CUT U, WTF CANADA
Posts: 16,743
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

[ QUOTE ]
This is why I posted the hand; was curious to see if anyone would say raise pre. I think raising preflop is a HORRIBLE play here. You bloat the pot OOP with a poor multi-way hand that's guaranteed to be against four opponents. Even on a flop like this, if you raise pre and bet out, someone with K9s is getting odds to call, whereas they're not otherwise. Additionally, if the flop missed me, it was an easy c/f. AQs is a better raise here, since it plays well multi-way. I'd mix it up with that hand, but raise AQo in that spot maybe 1% of the time at most.

I was definitely planning to fold to a turn raise. The players in that hand didn't strike me as creative enough to raise turn with a hand I'm beating.

And this was Sunday; I started the game and played until it broke 4-5 hours later, I think, around 7. I was the guy with the Lord of the Rings card protector if you were there then.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:25 AM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

Let's hear, Dave. I assume you think it's an auto-raise, but two big cards aren't always "WOW, MUST BUMP." Let's hear why you think AQo should always be raised there.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:26 AM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

BTW, I should add that the chances of me taking down a pot there when I missed the flop are practically nil. I hadn't been there long when this hand came up but several of the people in had already announced themselves as weak fish.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:27 AM
WMB WMB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 438
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

i agree with your line and thought process Aragorn.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:28 AM
AragornX151 AragornX151 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 876
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

One more add: with one limper, I'm always raising and with two, I'm sometimes raising. With three+, it's too many for me to want to bloat the pot with that kind of hand there.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:35 AM
The DaveR The DaveR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: IMA CUT U, WTF CANADA
Posts: 16,743
Default Re: 40-80 AQ hand

[ QUOTE ]
Let's hear, Dave. I assume you think it's an auto-raise, but two big cards aren't always "WOW, MUST BUMP." Let's hear why you think AQo should always be raised there.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here and here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.