ipoker bonuses vs. the rest

[bkkdude]

any contribution place cant hold a dealt places jockstrap and thats just the way it is.

what limits u play to make $8 an hour per table.

me and this play micro.

i want to hear from someone other than bobo. you and i just dont see things the same way.

when is someone gonna say they make more clearing rakeback at dog than anyplace else. dog is weighted contribution btw.

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
any contribution place cant hold a dealt places jockstrap and thats just the way it is.

[/ QUOTE ]
Again, it depends on what you play, and that's just the way it is. I'll leave it at that. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
what limits u play to make $8 an hour per table.

[/ QUOTE ]
2/4-3/6 SH FL. Mostly 2/4.

[bkkdude]

u not a small limit player guy. thats y its ez for you.

pot limit games , most pots small, very few get to max rake level.

this is y i doubt thiss ability to clear so ez at micro games.

play same type game at dealt and contribtio n place and u make more at contrbution place is hard for me to understand.

it is so ez to clear $100 at crypto even with their nit picking games than it is to clear same amount at ongame , same game same limits at both.

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
it is so ez to clear $100 at crypto even with their nit picking games than it is to clear same amount at ongame , same game same limits at both.

[/ QUOTE ]
On this we can agree. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[thisnamedoesntfi]

I can see a comparison between Crypto and the 9x Ongame bonuses, but the 5x/6x, I don't see how Crypto beats that. I'm basing that off Crypto being the same as Everest system. Am I right that it's 16.67x dealt?

@BKK, Which bonuses are you having trouble clearing at OnGame?

[bkkdude]

the 7x. im not having trouble its just tha t it takes a long time when u compare it to a dealt room.

ongame games r no doubt livelier and therefore more fun but there r better rooms for bonus and rakeback clearing. WAY BETTER!

[thisnamedoesntfi]

If the games are livelier (imo they are too due to bonuses being contributed) there is more dead money, larger pots = more points per hand.

I haven't played on Crypto yet (looks like I'll have to go there next) but their system looks identical to Everest. Everest imo, doesn't clear as quickly as OnGame unless I sit at a new table,(which I do) and get double points.

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
ongame games r no doubt livelier and therefore more fun but there r better rooms for bonus and rakeback clearing at the games/stakes I play. WAY BETTER!

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP.

[Bobo Fett]

[ QUOTE ]
I can see a comparison between Crypto and the 9x Ongame bonuses, but the 5x/6x, I don't see how Crypto beats that. I'm basing that off Crypto being the same as Everest system. Am I right that it's 16.67x dealt?

@BKK, Which bonuses are you having trouble clearing at OnGame?

[/ QUOTE ]
BW shows it as 14.28x. Most Cryptos are 5x, which is why they crush Everest, and are even better than OnGame at many limits. Cryptos aren't quite as good at the micros, since you either get 0.25 MPPs (for $0.25 rake) or 1 MPP (for $1 rake), nothing in between.

[bkkdude]

u play mostly 2-4........lol.

let me see. $8 an hour u need 56 points at ongame.

as i suspected at that level pots rarely get to max rake level.

pots do get to $20 average. so to get 56 points u have to be in 56 pots per hour .

man u must put into pot 80% of the time..........lol.

u want me to believe u clear $8 bomus at ongame at least say u play 10-20 or higher.............lol.