|
|
#11
10-15-2007, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100
10+ tabling is not standard for midstakes cash game play. also if you have a 6+ winrate 10 tabling, you are a midstakes god... to answer the original question, if you can have a winrate between 2-4 you are doing well.
|
|
#12
10-15-2007, 04:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I consider multitabling 10+ tables [/ QUOTE ] haha what are your thoughts on polygamy? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yeah i was loling at multi tabling being defined at 10+ tables too. jesus god man. i know plenty of people do it, but i don't think its at all standard. [/ QUOTE ] lol. how many tables do most of you guys play these days, I still play 11-12, my MT ratio is above 9.5, I thought that was still pretty much the norm....
|
|
#13
10-15-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100
1) I want to see a 450K sample of someone running at 6ptbb 10 tabling or it's not possible.
2) people move up before then 3) is it possible though? 4) yeah, I'll bet you I could do it. 5) ok I'll need an escrow, and it would have to be big enough to be worth my while 6) f that. Who cares.
|
|
#19
10-15-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] lol. how many tables do most of you guys play these days, I still play 11-12, my MT ratio is above 9.5, I thought that was still pretty much the norm.... [/ QUOTE ] it isn't and never has been. [/ QUOTE ] I sure thought it was back on party when the games were softer and everyone was running @ 6+....
|
|
#20
10-15-2007, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6 [/ QUOTE ] 6 is pretty [censored] good in this day and age. Seabeast is the only person I've seen post proof of running @ 6 while multitabling over a large sample (I consider multitabling 10+ tables). I'm sure there are a couple others but they're few and far between. 4 is very solid for 12 tabling. [/ QUOTE ] 12 tabling seems like a bad idea. Also, I have 5.7ptbb over 100k hands w/n lsat 4 months. 6 is def doable
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
