Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:21 PM
DrVanNostrin DrVanNostrin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: throwing my cards at the dealer
Posts: 656
Default Re: malmuth on bluffing

[ QUOTE ]
Is he not speaking in an all-knowing theory manner? Meaning when the guy who bluffs zero percent of the time bets, he is only betting when he has the best hand. And for the guy that bluffs 50% of the time, he is only bluffing when he has the worst hand for certain.

Sometimes you obviously bluff with the best hand or value bet the worse, but that would needlessly complicate basic theoretic models.

This seems like the most obvious explanation here. Occam FTW? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
I would be helpful to have the essay. Without it we really can't say what he's talking about. I would guess that the folks who say he's wrong have mininterpreted what he wrote.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.