CTS did something like this in his video

[theplux]

and it wasnt really the same situation CTS used to shove with. but its not a bad shove here.

[scallop]

can someone post the cts hand?

[martijn]

yes but cts is also a incredibly skilled postflop player who plays extremely well in thin spots, we dont.

[Paul Thomson]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you're not cts.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

so????

I dunno exactly what OP is refering to, but why would it work for CTS and not OP?

I mean if you have enough F/E in the shove to make up for calling and losing then its obv a good play. And like we are quite live if called...

Also, for most people I do not think this is a snap call with an underpair.

[/ QUOTE ]

pushing turn is fine like i said. but trying to play like cts at this level is probably spew.

however, betting turn is fine given stack sizes but i'd check behind if we were alot deepeer.

[imozyslow]

looks fine to me (not sure if thats good or not tho :P)

also, y ou were begging for it with the title of this post. shouldve just said "float in rr pot picks up outs", then everyone would be like "oh...std, etc".

[EgoSlasher]

Completely opponent specific.

[Bigmoney]

villain would probably bet this turn if he had air

if he cant read hands i guess its alright

[Unknown Soldier]

probably ok with your equity.

[Go_Blue88]

def not sure how that ace is supposed to help your hand. he can narrow your range to like maaaaybe AJ and a set.

[TianYuan]

CTS' hand went something like: raise, opponent 3bet, he make tiny tiny 4bet with 65o, cbet halfpot~ on 7AK 2 diamond flop, push for close to 2/3 pot on 8x turn.

In the hand above, does anyone like checking the turn back and then either checking behind (if we pair up), valueshove (if we spike) or bluffshove (if we miss)?