Week 10 Rank'em - Page 2

TomCollins · #1 11-04-2007, 10:32 AM

[ QUOTE ]

Missouri has crushed two teams that were ranked in the top 25 when they played (Texas Tech and Nebraska).

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the dumbest logic ever for giving a team credit. Who cares where a team WAS ranked. Who CANT crush Nebraska? Texas Tech is decent but clearly not deserving of being ranked.

Interesting is that the Sagarin predictor puts Missouri at #9, and West Virginia at #4.

Arnold_O · #2 11-04-2007, 04:25 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Why is everyone ranking West Virginia over Missouri? The only top 25 team they have beaten is Rutgers (ranked 25 at the time). The Mountaineers' one loss to South Florida is not looking as good now.

[/ QUOTE ]an hour after i ranked west virginia ahead of missouri i took a look at it and started questioning it. i remember saying to myself that they should really be tied at this point. both are solid

iron81 · #3 11-04-2007, 06:02 PM

Code:<hr /><pre>
1. Ohio State (10-0) 1 2823 0.9993 1 1493 0.9953 1 99 0.990 0.9949 1
2. LSU (8-1) 2 2640 0.9345 2 1393 0.9287 2 96 0.960 0.9411 3
3. Oregon (8-1) 3 2590 0.9168 3 1376 0.9173 3 92 0.920 0.9180 5
4. Kansas (9-0) 5 2322 0.8219 5 1241 0.8273 4 88 0.880 0.8431 8
5. Oklahoma (8-1) 4 2518 0.8913 4 1330 0.8867 7 74 0.740 0.8393 6
6. Missouri (8-1) 7 2111 0.7473 7 1143 0.7620 8 72 0.720 0.7431 9
7. West Virginia (7-1) 6 2291 0.8110 6 1222 0.8147 12 60 0.600 0.7419 7
8. Boston College (8-1) 8 1836 0.6499 8 951 0.6340 6 81 0.810 0.6980 2
9. Arizona State (8-1) 9 1720 0.6088 9 946 0.6307 5 84 0.840 0.6932 4
10. Georgia (7-2) 11 1651 0.5844 10 927 0.6180 9 62 0.620 0.6075 10
11. Virginia Tech (7-2) 13 1500 0.5310 11 829 0.5527 10 61 0.610 0.5645 11
12. Michigan (8-2) 15 1332 0.4715 13 770 0.5133 13 49 0.490 0.4916 12
13. Connecticut (8-1) 16 1137 0.4025 16 568 0.3787 10 61 0.610 0.4637 13
14. Texas (8-2) 12 1540 0.5451 14 757 0.5047 18 27 0.270 0.4399 15
15. Florida (6-3) 17 1079 0.3819 18 529 0.3527 15 47 0.470 0.4015 20
16. Hawaii (8-0) 10 1677 0.5936 12 807 0.5380 NR 0 0.000 0.3772 14
17. USC (7-2) 14 1404 0.4970 15 706 0.4707 23 16 0.160 0.3759 19
18. Auburn (7-3) 18 975 0.3451 17 551 0.3673 17 28 0.280 0.3308 16
19. Virginia (8-2) 21 486 0.1720 21 259 0.1727 14 48 0.480 0.2749 23
20. Boise State (8-1) 19 747 0.2644 19 368 0.2453 22 19 0.190 0.2333 22
21. Clemson (7-2) 20 493 0.1745 20 318 0.2120 16 30 0.300 0.2288 25
22. Alabama (6-3) 22 437 0.1547 23 174 0.1160 20 23 0.230 0.1669 17
23. Penn State (7-3) 26 178 0.0630 25 105 0.0700 19 24 0.240 0.1243 NR
24. Tennessee (6-3) 24 251 0.0888 24 114 0.0760 24 15 0.150 0.1049 NR
25. Kentucky (6-3) 23 288 0.1019 22 197 0.1313 26 4 0.040 0.0911 NR </pre><hr />

Jack of Arcades · #4 11-04-2007, 06:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Code:<hr /><pre>
1. Ohio State (10-0) 1 2823 0.9993 1 1493 0.9953 1 99 0.990 0.9949 1
2. LSU (8-1) 2 2640 0.9345 2 1393 0.9287 2 96 0.960 0.9411 3
3. Oregon (8-1) 3 2590 0.9168 3 1376 0.9173 3 92 0.920 0.9180 5</pre><hr />

[/ QUOTE ]

Oregon is probably better than LSU, but hey whatever, I'll support a broken system if it puts LSU in the title game.

The idea that we rely on humans to pick who the best teams are is nuts though.

Semtex · #5 11-06-2007, 06:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Code:<hr /><pre>
1. Ohio State (10-0) 1 2823 0.9993 1 1493 0.9953 1 99 0.990 0.9949 1
2. LSU (8-1) 2 2640 0.9345 2 1393 0.9287 2 96 0.960 0.9411 3
3. Oregon (8-1) 3 2590 0.9168 3 1376 0.9173 3 92 0.920 0.9180 5
4. Kansas (9-0) 5 2322 0.8219 5 1241 0.8273 4 88 0.880 0.8431 8
5. Oklahoma (8-1) 4 2518 0.8913 4 1330 0.8867 7 74 0.740 0.8393 6
6. Missouri (8-1) 7 2111 0.7473 7 1143 0.7620 8 72 0.720 0.7431 9
7. West Virginia (7-1) 6 2291 0.8110 6 1222 0.8147 12 60 0.600 0.7419 7
8. Boston College (8-1) 8 1836 0.6499 8 951 0.6340 6 81 0.810 0.6980 2
9. Arizona State (8-1) 9 1720 0.6088 9 946 0.6307 5 84 0.840 0.6932 4
10. Georgia (7-2) 11 1651 0.5844 10 927 0.6180 9 62 0.620 0.6075 10
11. Virginia Tech (7-2) 13 1500 0.5310 11 829 0.5527 10 61 0.610 0.5645 11
12. Michigan (8-2) 15 1332 0.4715 13 770 0.5133 13 49 0.490 0.4916 12
13. Connecticut (8-1) 16 1137 0.4025 16 568 0.3787 10 61 0.610 0.4637 13
14. Texas (8-2) 12 1540 0.5451 14 757 0.5047 18 27 0.270 0.4399 15
15. Florida (6-3) 17 1079 0.3819 18 529 0.3527 15 47 0.470 0.4015 20
16. Hawaii (8-0) 10 1677 0.5936 12 807 0.5380 NR 0 0.000 0.3772 14
17. USC (7-2) 14 1404 0.4970 15 706 0.4707 23 16 0.160 0.3759 19
18. Auburn (7-3) 18 975 0.3451 17 551 0.3673 17 28 0.280 0.3308 16
19. Virginia (8-2) 21 486 0.1720 21 259 0.1727 14 48 0.480 0.2749 23
20. Boise State (8-1) 19 747 0.2644 19 368 0.2453 22 19 0.190 0.2333 22
21. Clemson (7-2) 20 493 0.1745 20 318 0.2120 16 30 0.300 0.2288 25
22. Alabama (6-3) 22 437 0.1547 23 174 0.1160 20 23 0.230 0.1669 17
23. Penn State (7-3) 26 178 0.0630 25 105 0.0700 19 24 0.240 0.1243 NR
24. Tennessee (6-3) 24 251 0.0888 24 114 0.0760 24 15 0.150 0.1049 NR
25. Kentucky (6-3) 23 288 0.1019 22 197 0.1313 26 4 0.040 0.0911 NR </pre><hr />

[/ QUOTE ]
Wow so much for USC squeaking into a bcs game. USC was ahead of UF in the BCS, loses to Oregon, while UF loses to Georgia, and 3 loss Florida somehow jumps them a couple weeks later. What a joke. Wins over Cal and ASU are going to have to count for a lot, but I doubt the voters give USC any love for a Cal win given how they've dropped off the map recently.

capone0 · #6 11-06-2007, 07:29 PM

USC is good? They don't deserve to squeak in anywhere. USC lost to Stanford for god sakes.

Semtex · #7 11-06-2007, 07:38 PM

[ QUOTE ]
USC is good? They don't deserve to squeak in anywhere. USC lost to Stanford for god sakes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Great logic. Classic. So you think both Oklahoma and Michigan are terrible as well and neither deserves a BCS bowl?

BigSoonerFan · #8 11-06-2007, 07:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
USC is good? They don't deserve to squeak in anywhere. USC lost to Stanford for god sakes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Great logic. Classic. So you think both Oklahoma and Michigan are terrible as well and neither deserves a BCS bowl?

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's see. Oklahoma beat one top ten team in Sagarin's top 10 and another in his top 30. USC hasn't beaten a top 30 team. Stanford (3-6) is worse than Colorado (5-5) according to his rankings (78th vs 43rd). So, based on that, Oklahoma cannot currently be considered as bad as USC.

capone0 · #9 11-07-2007, 12:23 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
USC is good? They don't deserve to squeak in anywhere. USC lost to Stanford for god sakes.

[/ QUOTE ]
Great logic. Classic. So you think both Oklahoma and Michigan are terrible as well and neither deserves a BCS bowl?

[/ QUOTE ]

I like Michigan but I think they are terrible as well and DON'T deserve a big bowl. Please give me 1 reason why USC deserves to be in a BCS bowl.

Wow they beat Nebraska on the raod and haven't beaten a decent team all year. Struggled vs Zona and Washington.

Michigan doesn't deserve to be in a BCS bowl either, but that doesn't mean b/c Michigan sucks, USC deserves to be in one. Maybe if they win out do they deserve it. Even then Cal, ASU, UCLA isn't as tough as it once seemed.

rwperu34 · #10 11-07-2007, 04:49 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Code:<hr /><pre>
1. Ohio State (10-0) 1 2823 0.9993 1 1493 0.9953 1 99 0.990 0.9949 1
2. LSU (8-1) 2 2640 0.9345 2 1393 0.9287 2 96 0.960 0.9411 3
3. Oregon (8-1) 3 2590 0.9168 3 1376 0.9173 3 92 0.920 0.9180 5
4. Kansas (9-0) 5 2322 0.8219 5 1241 0.8273 4 88 0.880 0.8431 8
5. Oklahoma (8-1) 4 2518 0.8913 4 1330 0.8867 7 74 0.740 0.8393 6
6. Missouri (8-1) 7 2111 0.7473 7 1143 0.7620 8 72 0.720 0.7431 9
7. West Virginia (7-1) 6 2291 0.8110 6 1222 0.8147 12 60 0.600 0.7419 7
8. Boston College (8-1) 8 1836 0.6499 8 951 0.6340 6 81 0.810 0.6980 2
9. Arizona State (8-1) 9 1720 0.6088 9 946 0.6307 5 84 0.840 0.6932 4
10. Georgia (7-2) 11 1651 0.5844 10 927 0.6180 9 62 0.620 0.6075 10
11. Virginia Tech (7-2) 13 1500 0.5310 11 829 0.5527 10 61 0.610 0.5645 11
12. Michigan (8-2) 15 1332 0.4715 13 770 0.5133 13 49 0.490 0.4916 12
13. Connecticut (8-1) 16 1137 0.4025 16 568 0.3787 10 61 0.610 0.4637 13
14. Texas (8-2) 12 1540 0.5451 14 757 0.5047 18 27 0.270 0.4399 15
15. Florida (6-3) 17 1079 0.3819 18 529 0.3527 15 47 0.470 0.4015 20
16. Hawaii (8-0) 10 1677 0.5936 12 807 0.5380 NR 0 0.000 0.3772 14
17. USC (7-2) 14 1404 0.4970 15 706 0.4707 23 16 0.160 0.3759 19
18. Auburn (7-3) 18 975 0.3451 17 551 0.3673 17 28 0.280 0.3308 16
19. Virginia (8-2) 21 486 0.1720 21 259 0.1727 14 48 0.480 0.2749 23
20. Boise State (8-1) 19 747 0.2644 19 368 0.2453 22 19 0.190 0.2333 22
21. Clemson (7-2) 20 493 0.1745 20 318 0.2120 16 30 0.300 0.2288 25
22. Alabama (6-3) 22 437 0.1547 23 174 0.1160 20 23 0.230 0.1669 17
23. Penn State (7-3) 26 178 0.0630 25 105 0.0700 19 24 0.240 0.1243 NR
24. Tennessee (6-3) 24 251 0.0888 24 114 0.0760 24 15 0.150 0.1049 NR
25. Kentucky (6-3) 23 288 0.1019 22 197 0.1313 26 4 0.040 0.0911 NR </pre><hr />

[/ QUOTE ]
Wow so much for USC squeaking into a bcs game. USC was ahead of UF in the BCS, loses to Oregon, while UF loses to Georgia, and 3 loss Florida somehow jumps them a couple weeks later. What a joke. Wins over Cal and ASU are going to have to count for a lot, but I doubt the voters give USC any love for a Cal win given how they've dropped off the map recently.

[/ QUOTE ]

The ASU vs USC winner is virtually a lock for the Rose/Fiesta Bowl.