76s in the blinds

[optionsguy]

are you trying to rep queens full cause this is awful.

[squashington]

PF: not a fan of 3betting oop against utg raisers w/ sc's
Flop: i bet more, prob 65-70% pot

I'd rather bet the turn than river. Him checking behind on turn tells me he's not folding that river.

[thac]

[ QUOTE ]
Nothing wrong with preflop

[/ QUOTE ]

We're readless other than the fact that he's a regular and you wanna 3-bet him OOP with trash?

Have fun with that.

[sh58]

why are you 3betting an unknown players UTG raise OOP w 76s. this is not good.

[Suigin406]

don't 3bet PF vs UTG...

eeeww...what's with the weak betting, trying to rep a full house here??

[Requin]

It is fun [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

We're not readless, we believe he is a regular. Think of the initial dynamic between two known regulars who don't have any history or reads; they usually give each other credit the first time they see an aggro move (at least they do at higher stakes). So if you get called here cbet A hi flops and probably Kxx, almost always check like 227r flops ect. since you are assuming he doesn't call you light the first time. I'm not saying I always pop here, but one of the best times to take a one-raise stab at something [be it a 3-bet, 4-bet or flop small raise] is when both players know the other is reasonably good and there is no reason for him to get suspicious and look you up. The default is almost always give credit the first time. If your a CR member you'll see TC talk about this sometimes when deciding when to pull out a 4-bet bluff PF.

[Lucky]

usually fold or if you play just call pf. If you do 3 bet, bet more.

On river, I don't hate it as much as others, but bet more. I don't think its unreasonalbe you fold out better hands like KK/JJ (no heart) or even a black AJ/AT.

[Requin]

Don't assume he calls AJ/AT without any history when his utg raise is popped. And also black JJ folds almost always on the flop without history.

Plus most aces w/o a heart will bet the turn.

[Chicago Twister]

requin,

there is almost zero correlation between someone having an ironman chip and being a non-drooler. i've seen them over poeple who buy in for 46.55 in to an nl100 game and play like a typical fish, tagfish, lagtards, everyone. good players are probably equally represented by ironman chips as those without.

so were totally readless imo

[thac]

[ QUOTE ]
requin,

there is almost zero correlation between someone having an ironman chip and being a non-drooler. i've seen them over poeple who buy in for 46.55 in to an nl100 game and play like a typical fish, tagfish, lagtards, everyone. good players are probably equally represented by ironman chips as those without.

so were totally readless imo

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, I've seen 56/24s with a 55bb stack with an ironman chip.