Warning

[Slim Pickens]

Are you mad because your STTF thread got locked for being stupid? This one is stupid as well. No one ever chops in a SNG.

[Ali shmali]

looks like the misread the chat. Did you point that out to them?

[TEXASGUY]

I asked CHOP? no answer for 15 seconds or so, then "sounds fair" from Jewel, just as I was saying guess not. once I got Jewels agreement, I asked Willie, he then said sure.

[TEXASGUY]

Obviously you do not play $200 sng's I have chopped many of them.

[5thStreetHog]

Im just thinking what stars mightve been thinking,im not saying you were wrong.

[Slim Pickens]

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously you do not play $200 sng's I have chopped many of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I do actually. That's why it's funny to me. I play more 100's than 200's, so maybe my sample is too small?

[ZBTHorton]

The only time I've ever seen SNG's chopped it's been the higher dollar buyins and it was because it was between two 2p2'rs, or two well known regulars. Those people would laugh at the idea of spending 20 minutes waiting on a SNG table for support to come do the chop, and would do it themselves.

[blackize]

Just as I suspected no agreement was made.

[Slim Pickens]

There was a thread a month or so ago about chopping in highest-level Stars SNGs. It was decided that it was unethical to pre-arrange a chop agreement because it totally changes the strategy and is equivalent to collusion. Although it's not strictly against the rules, that sort of behavior would kill those games, as the fish would think the pros were conspiring against them, everyone becomes a breakeven player, and Stars gets everyone's money via the rake.

[BradleyT]

[ QUOTE ]
Whatever, I am a winning lame ass loser.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah

Username Games Played Av. Profit Av. Stake Av. ROI Total Profit Form Network Filter
TEX7 546 -$3 $78 3% -$1,875 - PokerStars x