The Theory of Relativity

[m_the0ry]

Unlike most advances in physics, the theory of relativity was proposed based on mathematical theory rather than observation. The theory rests on two postulates that are difficult to test, and then derives mathematically what the physical consequences should be. Those two postulates are that the speed of light never changes, and that all laws of physics are the same in every (inertial) frame of reference no matter where it is or how fast it is traveling. This theory rejects Isaac Newton's God-given theory of gravitation and replaces it with a concept that there is a continuum of space and time, and that large masses (like the sun) bend space in a manner similar to how a finger can depress an area of a balloon. From this proposed bending of space the expression arose that "space is curved." But experiments later proved that space is flat overall.

Nothing useful has even been built based on the theory of relativity. Scientists claim that this is because relativity only applies to extremely heavy or fast objects and rely on future scientists to finally come up with the proof that will vindicate their life's work. Most conservatives are skeptical since science is supposed to be about finding proof before a theory becomes a fact, not after. Albert Einstein's work had nothing to do with the development of the atomic bomb, contrary to popular opinion. Only one Nobel Prize has ever been given (in 1993) that relates to relativity, and the validity of that particular award is questionable. Many things predicted by the theory of relativity, such as gravitons, have never been found despite much searching for them. Many observed phenomenon, such as the bending of light passing near the sun or the advance of the perihelion in the orbit of Mercury, can be also predicted by Newton's theory.

British Historian Paul Johnson declares the turning point in 20th century to have been when fellow Brit Sir Arthur Eddington, the top English astronomer, ventured out on a boat off Africa in 1919 to observe the bending of starlight around the sun during a total eclipse. The theory of relativity predicts twice the bending of light around massive objects compared to Newton's theory, and an eclipse is required to darken the sun so that the starlight may be seen in proximity to the sun. Eddington liked publicity and probably dreamed of winning a Nobel Prize, and upon his return to England declared that his observations proven the theory of relativity. That was good enough for reporters and historians, but the Nobel committee was not impressed and declined to give him an award. Recent analysis of Eddington's work revealed that he was biased in selecting his data, and that overall his data was inconclusive about the theory of relativity.

Eddington next promoted the theory of relativity to the English-speaking world in his Mathematical Theory of Relativity (1923). As the title suggests, this theory was more a mathematical vision of how the universe should be, rather than what it actually was. When a reporter asked Eddington whether only three people even understood the theory, Eddington supposedly retorted, "Who's the third?"

Just as “social Darwinism” arose from Darwinism, many seized upon the theory of relativity to apply it in a vague way to morality and social issues. “All things are relative” became popular as atheists and others used relativity to attack Christian values. There remains enormous political support for the theory of relativity that has nothing to do with physics, and Congress continues to spend billions of dollars unsuccessfully searching for particles predicted by the theory of relativity.




Source

[DrunkHamster]

I'm convinced!

[Roland32]

Awesome.

Reminds me of "Fair Game" theory of public relations by Scientology. ATTACK THE MESSENGER!

[luckyme]

I assume (hope) it's by the writers at Saturday Night Live.

luckyme

[tpir]

[ QUOTE ]
Unlike most advances in physics, the theory of relativity was proposed based on mathematical theory rather than observation.

[/ QUOTE ]
Not quite. It doesn't really matter though since all of the observations have since been verified experimentally.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html


[ QUOTE ]
Nothing useful has even been built based on the theory of relativity.

[/ QUOTE ]
NASA and people who rely on satellites (i.e. everyone on Earth) would disagree. GPS satellies, for example, are programmed to account for relativistic time shifting (which does occur) to get the locations correct.


[ QUOTE ]
“All things are relative” became popular as atheists and others used relativity to attack Christian values.

[/ QUOTE ]
It did?


[ QUOTE ]
There remains enormous political support for the theory of relativity that has nothing to do with physics, and Congress continues to spend billions of dollars unsuccessfully searching for particles predicted by the theory of relativity.

[/ QUOTE ]
o rly?

[MelchyBeau]

i love the sources that your article cites. How wonderful.

What particles are predicted by the theory of relativity?

[tpir]

I assume you are talking about OP's article. It should be noted that was just a temporary edit of the article and the current one on their wiki is much more reasonable... although I still shudder at the idea of a conservapedia.

[KipBond]

[ QUOTE ]
Source

[/ QUOTE ]

Unreal. First heard of this "Conservapedia" yesterday. It's amazing how hard ignorant people try to remain ignorant.

[Philo]

A quick summary:

Einstein was an atheist. Boo!

Newton was a fanatical Christian. Yay!

[GMontag]

Somehow, Conservapedia always makes me feel like I'm getting leveled.