#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
NL200-600 are still relatively as easy as microlimits because fish are still fish.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
[ QUOTE ]
i crush 2/4-5/10 and im positive i would not be a winner at microlimits over 1k+ hands [/ QUOTE ] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
i think easiest games online are .5/1 and 1/2nl
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
Scale theorem of online poker explains why 1.2 is so much easier than 25NL-100NL
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...=0#Post11442972 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
Pretty sure you can play a snug 77/17, at least at the nanos.
100 deeper, ah, better off multi-tabling and staying snugger than that. And then there's this... PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font> UTG+1 ($1.75) MP1 ($1.98) MP2 ($13.96) MP3 ($0.94) CO ($1.90) Button ($0.89) <font color="#C00000">SB ($2.78)</font> BB ($6.83) <font color="#C00000">Valentyno ($5)</font> Preflop: Valentyno is UTG with 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. Valentyno posts a blind of $0.02. Valentyno (poster) checks, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP3 calls $0.02, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls $0.02, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $0.04</font>, BB calls $0.02, <font color="#CC3333">Valentyno raises to $0.06</font>, MP3 folds, Button calls $0.04, SB calls $0.02, BB calls $0.02. Flop: ($0.26) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets $0.06</font>, BB folds, <font color="#CC3333">Valentyno raises to $0.2</font>, Button folds, SB calls $0.14. Turn: ($0.66) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets $2.52 (All-In)</font>, Valentyno calls $2.52. River: ($0) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font> Final Pot: $5.70 Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> SB has Kd 4c (one pair, kings). Valentyno has 7h Ts (flush, ace high). Outcome: Valentyno wins $5.70. </font> That said, yeah, even that tests my patience, so I usually go for very short sessions. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
[ QUOTE ]
Was just wondering, because it seems like the standard continuation bet never work at the micro limit. However, it works ~75% of the time in medium limits. So is it easier to play solid poker in the medium stakes than micro limits? [/ QUOTE ] Girls making out; didn't read. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
EVERYONE JUST WANTS TO CALL ME LIKE CRAZY WHEN I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
I played one session of 200 NL and crushed the game. Then played ~400 hands at at the 50NL and got crushed.
Happens all the time! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
wow
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are micro limits harder to play than medium or high stakes?
I personally find NL100 the easiest game on the internet and this includes everything <NL100.
Why this is I dont know but I seriously get raped at every [censored] level upto this yet but absolutely destroy NL100. Someone please tell me why this is. |
|
|