|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which proof is better? | |||
| Proof one |
   
|
29 | 61.70% |
| Proof two |
  
|
9 | 19.15% |
| Neither |
  
|
2 | 4.26% |
| I dont have an opinion |
  
|
7 | 14.89% |
| Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
10-10-2007, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
1 year from now and i will make hundreds of thousands!!!
|
|
#12
10-10-2007, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
clear no.
|
|
#13
10-10-2007, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
is there any content to the responses? i feel i m gonna crush you with 3 promile.
|
|
#14
10-10-2007, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
actually msnl has 1 intelligent person besides me voting yes!!! there is still hope for 2+2.
|
|
#15
10-10-2007, 06:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
Ban.
|
|
#16
10-10-2007, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
dont be intolerant!
|
|
#17
10-10-2007, 06:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Calling more marginal hands to have a wider range on the flop?
Terrible thread.
Maybe try again with some thought put into it instead of just smearing feces all over your keyboard and insulting people. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
