Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #621  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
skiier04 skiier04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philadelphia Phillies 2008
Posts: 1,354
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

I have a funny feeling Vinatieri will miss or this is getting blocked.
Reply With Quote
  #622  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
MacGuyV MacGuyV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: old school
Posts: 10,100
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
go for the kick here. 1 point lead is all you need against this SD O right now

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I forgot about Rivers I guess. You go for it if you're playing Manning/Brady though right?

[/ QUOTE ]

No timeouts left? Eh...I think you have to kick it in any situation.

Well Mac they are listening to you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Against a good QB that only needs a FG with 1:30 left, time outs are pretty much a non-factor imo.
Reply With Quote
  #623  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
Nonfiction Nonfiction is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,916
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

FAKE FG VINITERI TD PLZ
Reply With Quote
  #624  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
fingokra fingokra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 599
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

[ QUOTE ]
Colts were trying to run the score up.

[/ QUOTE ]lol
Reply With Quote
  #625  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

That's awful, he's allowed to shift there. Bad call, not that it matters, hard count, it's not like he was snapping it.

Cody
Reply With Quote
  #626  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

were they going for it there or just trying to get a false start on the Chargers?
Reply With Quote
  #627  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
.Alex. .Alex. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,754
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

Wouldn't going for it be correct? A QB sneak will be successful over 95% of the time which ends the game barring a missed chip shot. Otherwise you give SD a shot. They have what, a 15% chance of getting a FG with the time left?
Reply With Quote
  #628  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
lastchance lastchance is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Don\'t edit my location
Posts: 22,856
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

Actually, that's pretty creative. But Chargers weren't biting.
Reply With Quote
  #629  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
Needle77 Needle77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: \"Needle Princip\" - Cody
Posts: 7,062
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

Pudge,

I hate when QB's take a timeout to avoid a delay of game on 3rd and 9+. Your chances of converting are slim no matter what.
Reply With Quote
  #630  
Old 11-12-2007, 12:32 AM
Richard Tanner Richard Tanner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Now this is a movement I can sink my teeth into
Posts: 3,187
Default Re: NFL Week 10 Sunday Night Football: Colts@ Chargers

[ QUOTE ]
I have a funny feeling Vinatieri will miss or this is getting blocked.

[/ QUOTE ]

Slip.

Cody
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.