stupid thought

[frozenfear]

not mine, but kind of interesting

1. You create an account on a site. You deposit and you are winning. ( new player - get them to win to stay )
2. downswing hits ( to keep the money circulating )
3. you cry and make a post on 2p2 and everyone says take a 2 day break and analyze your play
4. you come back and omg you are winning again ( site noticed lack of rake when you win )
5. small downswing big heater, little bigger downswing, smaller heater ( keep you in line and to build rake )


variance?

how about that the site generates a program that at certain actions and intervals gives your specific account a higher chance of winning or losing..

for example if everything was normal lets say it would be 50/50 everything is fair this is counting without the edge you have vs worse players

when you first start its 6% higher to win and lower after and so on and so on..

I mean I have gone to the casino maybe almost everyday for 3 months

so about lets say 70 2 hour sessions, I honestly remember leaving the casino only around 5 times a loser..
( yes weaker players but regardless )




THIS IS NOT FROZENFEARS STORY OR THEORY tought it was interesting

[kyleb]

no

[soah]

[ QUOTE ]
tought it was interesting

[/ QUOTE ]

you were mistaken

[a nonymous]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tought it was interesting

[/ QUOTE ]

you were mistaken

[/ QUOTE ]
lol

[CCx]

[ QUOTE ]
stupid thought

[/ QUOTE ]

correct

[Assani Fisher]

frozenfear, its a decent theory and a viable reason why sites would rig their software. However, 90% of the people here will mock you the instant you mention anything being rigged. I've always thought that those types of people were as ignorant as the "OMG it must be rigged" type of people. The smart viewpoint imo is somewhere in between and willing to admit that anything is possible.

[kyleb]

nope

[a nonymous]

[ QUOTE ]
frozenfear, its a decent theory and a viable reason why sites would rig their software. However, 90% of the people here will mock you the instant you mention anything being rigged. I've always thought that those types of people were as ignorant as the "OMG it must be rigged" type of people. The smart viewpoint imo is somewhere in between and willing to admit that anything is possible.

[/ QUOTE ]
lol

Have you even thought it through? It seems you have... but try again please.

Stop and think about it from the perspective of the poker sites (you know, the poker sites you are claiming would want to rig the games, the ones responsible for the decision to rig or not to rig). Think about what is in their best interests. Then come back and apologize to all of us. Ty.

Edit:

[ QUOTE ]
The smart viewpoint imo is somewhere in between and willing to admit that anything is possible.

[/ QUOTE ]
Which is more relevant: Whether something is possible or whether something is likely? Again, think please.

[Assani Fisher]

[ QUOTE ]
nope

[/ QUOTE ]

You could probably take this as a compliment or an insult depending upon how you look at it....

But for someone who seems like a decent guy at times, you sure come across as arrogant and condescending a lot. Regardless of whether you're right or wrong, it just makes you look immature imo.

[Coy_Roy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
nope

[/ QUOTE ]

You could probably take this as a compliment or an insult depending upon how you look at it....

But for someone who seems like a decent guy at times, you sure come across as arrogant and condescending a lot. Regardless of whether you're right or wrong, it just makes you look immature imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree.