Ugggh, set fold

[jj12]

call

[Triumph36]

two flush draws, an one card outside straight draw, and you are not raising the turn, why?

fold on riv seems good but wth

[ArturiusX]

I seriously considered re-raising the turn, and probably would in hindsight. So many semi bluff combos.

I think its interesting though all the people who say make it 3 on the turn want to call the river.

[WelshChip]

because clubs are the only thing that made it on the river that would c/r the flop

[mythrilfox]

"I think its interesting though all the people who say make it 3 on the turn want to call the river."

why is that interesting? we have a very good hand against a line that doesn't make any sense.

[poker12]

confirms my last post

[LouisCyphre]

[ QUOTE ]

I think its interesting though all the people who say make it 3 on the turn want to call the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because
a) I want to stack 66/55 instead of getting a measly $100 on the river
b) I want to charge any of the two possible flush draws plus the possible straight draw
c) I don't want to wonder on the river if I should fold with a set getting better than 3:1.

Edit: "spade draw" corrected to "straight draw"

[WelshChip]

[ QUOTE ]


b) I want to charge any of the two possible flush draws plus the possible spade draw


[/ QUOTE ]

[ArturiusX]

[ QUOTE ]
confirms my last post

[/ QUOTE ]

what up troll

[ArturiusX]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I think its interesting though all the people who say make it 3 on the turn want to call the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because
a) I want to stack 66/55 instead of getting a measly $100 on the river
b) I want to charge any of the two possible flush draws plus the possible straight draw
c) I don't want to wonder on the river if I should fold with a set getting better than 3:1.

Edit: "spade draw" corrected to "straight draw"

[/ QUOTE ]

This is reasons to 3bet, which I'd probably do in hindsight. All I'm saying is, if we think he's semi bluffing on the turn, what are we beating that bets $110 on this river?