|
View Poll Results: Who wins the 2006 Sports Illustrated Sportsman of the Year Award? | |||
Billy Donovan | 1 | 1.67% | |
Vince Young | 2 | 3.33% | |
Italy's WC Team | 1 | 1.67% | |
Bill Cowher | 0 | 0% | |
Roger Federer | 11 | 18.33% | |
Dwayne Wade | 5 | 8.33% | |
Tony La Russa | 1 | 1.67% | |
Paul Tagliabue | 2 | 3.33% | |
George Mason men's bb team | 4 | 6.67% | |
Tiger Woods | 28 | 46.67% | |
"Game of Shadows" writers | 3 | 5.00% | |
Other | 2 | 3.33% | |
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] hm... UTG+1 has AJ, BTN TT you should call [/ QUOTE ] Come on now! Limping on the button with TT!? And then calling on that flop!? [/ QUOTE ] well you do seem to overlimp a lot, even when the first limper is someone you should want to isolate vs a 60VPIP limper, I can't think of anything that makes more sense to overlimp vs Isolate [/ QUOTE ] How is that massive sample of half a dozen limped showdown hands you have on me? If I limp pre it's generally because it's the most effective play at those tables. I'm not sure that your second sentence makes sense either. I'm sure you're not advocating a limp with TT here but that how it reads to me. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Any Full Tilt regulars on here? NL 200 and NL 100
Once again, players like Narena are profitable largely because of a huge advantage in postflop play over the average player. As somebody who limps even more often than he does, and at a 3ptbb/100 profit, I just have to point out that there are many effective players who play vastly different styles of poker. Seeing cheap flops when possible against calling station donks and waiting for the right time to strike can be extremely profitable just as a more aggro game can be in different ways. The higher the stakes and the deeper the stacks, this can obviously change but I see no reason to bash a good thinking player's tendency to limp just because you don't play that way.
|
|
|