|
|
#1
02-02-2007, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
blind v. blind, 22$ 180
i was kinda lost on the river, anyways no read on the villian, early in a 180.
PokerStars Game #8246118440: Tournament #42056528, $20+$2 Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2007/02/02 - 16:26:26 (ET) Table '42056528 9' 9-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 1: splitaces (2230 in chips) Seat 2: Twizz76 (1440 in chips) Seat 3: Student36 (1440 in chips) Seat 4: Acool-chickA (1660 in chips) Seat 5: charder30 (1440 in chips) Seat 6: Bob E Do (1110 in chips) Seat 7: docgamma (2090 in chips) Seat 8: BradleyMac (1220 in chips) Seat 9: stef1973 (870 in chips) charder30: posts small blind 15 Bob E Do: posts big blind 30 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to charder30 [7d 7h] docgamma: folds BradleyMac: folds stef1973: folds splitaces: folds Twizz76: folds Student36: folds Acool-chickA: folds charder30: calls 15 Bob E Do: raises 60 to 90 charder30: calls 60 *** FLOP *** [Ah Th 5d] charder30: checks Bob E Do: checks *** TURN *** [Ah Th 5d] [7c] charder30: bets 90 Bob E Do: calls 90 *** RIVER *** [Ah Th 5d 7c] [2h] charder30: bets 180 Bob E Do: raises 750 to 930 and is all-in charder30: .......... 
|
|
#2
02-02-2007, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: blind v. blind, 22$ 180
against an unknown you definitely have to call. if you know the guy real well i could see how it could possibly be a fold; but even then... probably not.
|
|
#5
02-02-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: blind v. blind, 22$ 180
[ QUOTE ]
bet the flop, bet the turn. makes calling the river a bit easier. [/ QUOTE ] bet the flop? with his preflop line? limp-calling and then leading at the ace high flop doesnt sound like a good idea to me. but i think limp-calling there sucks, raise pf (or even lrr)
|
|
#6
02-02-2007, 06:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: blind v. blind, 22$ 180
wow you played 1 street correctly, limp calling is awful make it 3x you should be doing that with 80% of your hands in the SB. Flop c/f is fine when he checks behind I get confused/worrried. Turn you need to bet more there are a lot of awful river cards. Against an unknown this is a fold hard to fold sets but A10 is the only non bluff that you beat and I am pretty sure if he checked behind with a set/2pair on flop he would raise the turn. He has the flush 80% of the time here AA 10% fluff 8% other stuff 2%
|
|
#7
02-02-2007, 06:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: blind v. blind, 22$ 180
[ QUOTE ]
wow you played 1 street correctly, limp calling is awful make it 3x you should be doing that with 80% of your hands in the SB. Flop c/f is fine when he checks behind I get confused/worrried. Turn you need to bet more there are a lot of awful river cards. Against an unknown this is a fold hard to fold sets but A10 is the only non bluff that you beat and I am pretty sure if he checked behind with a set/2pair on flop he would raise the turn. He has the flush 80% of the time here AA 10% fluff 8% other stuff 2% [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't he bet flop with flush draw?
|
|
#9
02-02-2007, 06:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: blind v. blind, 22$ 180
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] wow you played 1 street correctly, limp calling is awful make it 3x you should be doing that with 80% of your hands in the SB. Flop c/f is fine when he checks behind I get confused/worrried. Turn you need to bet more there are a lot of awful river cards. Against an unknown this is a fold hard to fold sets but A10 is the only non bluff that you beat and I am pretty sure if he checked behind with a set/2pair on flop he would raise the turn. He has the flush 80% of the time here AA 10% fluff 8% other stuff 2% [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't he bet flop with flush draw? [/ QUOTE ] not all players bet when any 2+2er should. I know a few regulars who are decent players but check behind with their KJh every time here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
