Another FR Split Poll

[Grinding2Ecstasy]

are you talknig about full tilt? i really disagree, replace 200 with 400

[coordi]

100NL is about adjusting to regulars and their tendancies. The fish are just as bad and only slightly less prominent. 200nl is a completely different ball game. I dont even have to play to know from the content. Also you look at 200nl tables and its almost always 1/2+ familiar faces. 100nl concepts can still be used at 50-, but being a standard solid TAG at 200nl+ isnt going to get you too far. 200+/100- seems like the obvious split.

[Grinding2Ecstasy]

wow im so glad i dont play on stars where you guys apparently play lol

[Kos13]

[ QUOTE ]
What about letting 100NL post in either forum?

It would be:
2NL-100NL
100NL+

[/ QUOTE ]

As a guy who plays 100 and 200, I know that if we split this way, I'd never post a hand on the 2-100 board.

I agree with the general feeling that 200+, in terms of skill, is the best way to split. However, I think you can argue that most of the 100 posts, at least from regular posters, are looking strictly for input from 200+ players because the people posting them are already the best players at 100-. Even if they aren't at 100NL as often as they are at 200NL, there are more regular posters mixing .50/1 and 1/2 than there are mixing .25/.50 and .50/1.

I agree that 200 is a different game, but IMO, the players posting 100NL hands are typically in a 200NL mindset (if that makes sense). Splitting 100- and 200+ is just going to result in a lack of overall 100NL posts, where splitting at 100+ isn't going to change the number of posts at all.

(I didn't vote for where we should split...I think both sides, 100+ and 200+, have a reasonable argument.)

[spainfull]

when you say 200NL is another game, are you talking about general level of every room or just PS and maybe FTP?

I think for people playing in uL 50NL its the level they can reach in a reasonable amount of time and NL100 its a bit out of scope. But, I also understand NL100 its too low for people playing high limits. So, split wherever you want, but please, split [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img].

[Kos13]

[ QUOTE ]
when you say 200NL is another game, are you talking about general level of every room or just PS and maybe FTP?

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably just the big sites. I have ~1500 total hands on Absolute and Bodog this year, and the play at 100-200 on those sites is considerably worse than even the donkiest 100 table on FTP.

[jack frost]

Who exactly is in charge of this we always talk about it but it never gets done who ultimatly makes the decision gets it done? I agree with too easy this forum is gonna take a big crap if we don't do some thing.

[pattay]

if this thread, coupled with too eazy's, doesnt incur a split in this forum i will have officially lost all faith in democracy. also, i would like to know the answer the JF's question above as well

[GiantBuddha]

What about splitting $2-50, $100+ with the idea that in all likelihood there would ultimately be three forums, $2-50, $100-200, and $400+, provided things went well?

[TheProdigy]

Ehh, you could do it the other way.

I actually voted for 100nl+, but now have changed my mind.

I remember my experience and growth, and I grew a crapload during my 100nl time period, but I was beating it bad when I was still minraising random hands/etc. 100nl is beatable by a lot of bad players, but 200nl is not nearly. 200nl should be the split, most likely for good because of traffic reasons 3 forums doesn't seem plausible.