Abnormal stats in PT or am I just bad?

[JBMSweden]

Ive read Krishans post but my numbers seem to be way off...

Am I playing really badly or just having a bad beat?

Sample is 6000 hands (which is small but it should give some indication).

Would be very, very grateful if someone could post their stats or comment on mine...
Numbers are BB/hand

AA 1,75
KK 0,25
QQ -0,13
JJ 0,06
TT 0,26
99 1,88
88 0,47
77 -0,63

AKs 1,58
AKo 0,30
AQs 1,49
AQo 0,07
AJs 0,79
AJo -0,66

KQs -0,57
KQo 0,25


VPIP 25,31
VPSB 36,07
PFRaise 15,89
AttSteal 32,68
Went to SD 36,98
Won at SD 48,60
FoldSB to steal 81,51
FoldBB to steal 56,38
Won when saw flop 43,19
Fold to river bet 35,88

Aggression flop 2,44
Aggression Turn 2,51
Aggrssion river 1,47
Total aggression (not including preflop) 1,47

Win%
HC 19,70
One pair 39,04
Two pair 51,47
Trips 61,90
Straight 80,49
Flush 75,00
Full House 75,00

Position
B 0,06
1 0,04
2 0,02
3 0,08
BB -0,19
SB -0,13

Am I bleeding heavily from the blinds?


It seems like evryone is hitting when I am hitting and bla bla bla - well, you know the story...

Are there any specific numbers that look abnormal?
I would appreciate all help as this is getting quite ridiculous I feel...

Ive been winning at 1/2 and 2/4 for 16 months and then this happened. All in all -2,9BB/100 for the last 6k hands.

[stonescar]

Variance...
180BB downswing is very common. 6k hands is a small sample. Keep playing...

[jakbse]

I think your WtSD/W$@SD are a bit off, but with a sample this small it's hard to say if it you should tighten up postflop or if you are just running bad.

[JBMSweden]

How much off is a bit off? Havent posted my stats before but ther could well be some truth in this as I am probably crying calling quite often...

[jakbse]

I think the concensus around here is that W$@SD should be around 52-57%

[Bill Haywood]

I see a lot more TAGs on 1/2 and lots of more 40-50% VPIP players at 2/4. Anybody have an idea why this is so?

I believe it. The more saavy players know to play within their bankroll.

At Prima, there's an even bigger difference between 1/2 full table and short handed. The full tables regularly have four or five people with vpip well under 20. Table as a whole might be 24. At 1/2!! They know the full tables are a better place for serious beginners.

[JBMSweden]

I am fully aware of the variance factor. My worst downswing before this (all in all 650BB) was about 200...
This last downswing obviously came when I moved up a limit...lol...
Funny thing is - the opposition on FullTilt seems to be easier at 2/4 than 1/2 (which might sound stupid coming from a guy with numbers like the above)...
I use PokerHud and I see a lot more TAGs on 1/2 and lots of more 40-50% VPIP players at 2/4.
Anybody have an idea why this is so?

Can someone please post their BB/hand for the abovementioned hands?

[StellarWind]

[ QUOTE ]
I am fully aware of the variance factor.

[/ QUOTE ]
Obviously you aren't or you wouldn't be taking a 6000-hand sample and posting win rates for individual starting hands. Complete waste of time.

[CrayZee]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am fully aware of the variance factor.

[/ QUOTE ]
Obviously you aren't or you wouldn't be taking a 6000-hand sample and posting win rates for individual starting hands. Complete waste of time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably just another personal paranoia post. Some people eat 6k hand samples for breakfast (or before the morning dump).

Yeah, sure you probably have leaks or whatever, but so do most.

[CUIRASSIER]

You can't just post stats for 6k hands if you have been winning over a period of 16 months.

Just keep playing.

Also if you do want to post stats post the whole sample, also work out how to do screenshots, it will save you alot of time.