#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
If CMac and Rolle are both out, I may go four units on the Browns.
Same if McNair is the starter...maybe five...but the odds on that happening are about 0.2%. - C - |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
Anyone else like Jac -3 +105 vs SD?
I feel like San Diego is getting credit for beating Indy when it was really more like indy forfeited. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else like Jac -3 +105 vs SD? I feel like San Diego is getting credit for beating Indy when it was really more like indy forfeited. [/ QUOTE ] Both teams have been impossible to figure out this year. I'll probably stay away from this game, maybe taking a look at the total instead. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
Just noticed something funny while looking at Wagerline consensus - apparently the line opened at BAL -17....so there are 51 bets for CLE +17 and 2 for BAL -17.
...who the hell bet BAL -17? http://www.wagerline.com/Handicapping/Co...ID=8821&t=0 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else like Jac -3 +105 vs SD? I feel like San Diego is getting credit for beating Indy when it was really more like indy forfeited. [/ QUOTE ] Meh, I think the line would've been the same last week. Maybe you could argue Jax isn't getting enough credit for winning 2 of 3 on the road with what's his name at QB... OTOH homefield really doesn't mean much to either team. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone else like Jac -3 +105 vs SD? I feel like San Diego is getting credit for beating Indy when it was really more like indy forfeited. [/ QUOTE ] Meh, I think the line would've been the same last week. Maybe you could argue Jax isn't getting enough credit for winning 2 of 3 on the road with what's his name at QB... OTOH homefield really doesn't mean much to either team. [/ QUOTE ] heh I think the first thing you said was exactly my point. imo the chargers showed they are worse than everyone thought, not better, even though they came away with a win vs the 2nd best team in the league. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
my book has NO at plus 1, should i pounce?
Edit: Also Clevland and the Giants have moved to 3 pt road favs. Maybe the ravens are too bad for a play but Det +3 look good. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
[ QUOTE ]
my book has NO at plus 1, should i pounce? [/ QUOTE ] I would not. In fact, I love Houston here. I think Houston is at least as good as NO. I think the line should be about 3. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
AJ is expected to play, right? Houston's offense is so much better with him and Schaub. If they both play, I think I like Houston.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** OFFICIAL 11/18/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
Load up on the Indy/KC u44.5
|
|
|