Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events

View Poll Results: ___
Michigan State 3 42.86%
Pittsburgh (H) 4 57.14%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-01-2007, 08:46 AM
dlk9s dlk9s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: It\'s not gonna happen.
Posts: 3,410
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

Hardy, Braun, and Fielder are not "significantly" better than Bill Hall. In fact, Hardy is not at all a better hitter than Hall.

I believe bunting was the correct move in each case last night. The next hitters just came up with the absolute worst AB's they could have.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-01-2007, 09:09 AM
prohornblower prohornblower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning the hockey-stop.
Posts: 8,016
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

Swing away. You didn't say whether or not #2 is good at bunting, so I assumed average.

When bunting, you can pop it up to catcher, or even get the guy out at third, or possibly if bunted too hard to pitcher, get a 3rd-to-1st DP. There is a lot that can go wrong. A successful bunt will allow #3 the sac fly option, though.

Swinging away may cause double play, but most likely would leave guy at 3rd who can score on any hit from #3 hitter. Striking out would suck, but whatever. Also, many singles will score runner from 2nd base (although 3rd base coach likely holds them up on close play as not to make first out at home).

And you give #2 hitter chance to be hero (See: Mr. November/Captain Clutch), which is more important to owners than winning. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-01-2007, 09:19 AM
MEbenhoe MEbenhoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: La Crosse, WI
Posts: 8,033
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

[ QUOTE ]
Hardy, Braun, and Fielder are not "significantly" better than Bill Hall. In fact, Hardy is not at all a better hitter than Hall.

I believe bunting was the correct move in each case last night. The next hitters just came up with the absolute worst AB's they could have.

[/ QUOTE ]

Braun and Fielder absolutely are wayyyyy better hitters than Hall, the only person you could even argue against would be Hardy.

My non-statistical way of thinking about this question was this. With your best 3 hitters coming up and only needing a single to win, except for the slight possibility of a double play, if you have them swing away, the opposing team will need to get through all 3 of your best hitters to prevent you from winning the game. Bunting in this situation effectively takes the bat out of 2 of your 3 best hitters. The #2 hitter now records a basically automatic out, and there is always the possibility of an unsuccessful bunt that results in a pop out or a force out at 3rd, or two foul bunts in a row that result in having to swing away with an 0-2 count. Now even if the bunt does succeed you have men on 2nd and 3rd with 1 out, and the opposing team can choose to walk your #3 hitter and pitch to the #4 hitter with the bases loaded, so now you've lost the ABs of your 2 and 3 hitter. Or they can pitch to the #3 hitter and if they get him out, walking the #4 hitter becomes obvious. Basically the point is, if the 2 hitter bunts, there is no way the 3 and 4 hitters are both getting an AB unless the bunt was unsuccessful. So now instead of having to deal with all 3 of the team's best hitters, the opposing team effectively only has to get out 1 of your best 3 hitters, and gets their choice of 1 of 2 to face.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-01-2007, 10:39 AM
J.R. J.R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,406
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

The success of a sacrifice attempt varies based on the D.

If you have The Book, check out page 283 (first edition). Long story short, its much harder to bunt in the 9th inning. To quote "The net result is that an average batter who bunts (as slightly worse than a league average hitter) achieves a greater WE for hitting away than from attempting a sacrifice, even in the bottom of the ninth in a tied game. Without going through the numbers, the results are similar with a runner on second or on first and second."

If your 2 hitter is average, Jack is right. It sounds like this 2 hitter is above average:

"In the ninth inning of a close game, below average hitters should bunt most of the time, given typical speed and bunting ability. Average hitters should bunt about half the time. Above average hitters should rarely bunt. The speed of he lead runner appears to be a significant in the success of failure of the sacrifice attempt in the ninth inning, and as always, the speed and bunting proficiency of the batter should be strongly considered." (p.284)

DP's matter a lot too.
"With a runner on first or first and second, and no outs, the batter's GDP rate (adjusted for the pitcher) should be considered in deciding whether to bunt." p 280
The

In a tied game in the bottom of the 9th, does not WE = RE?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-01-2007, 11:34 AM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La-la land, where else?
Posts: 17,636
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

Mostly hit away. Fast runner on second, #4 hitter who doesn't hit into a lot of double plays, bunt more often.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-01-2007, 11:52 AM
DrewDevil DrewDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,715
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

Augie Garrido, who has won more games than any other college coach ever, said that with 1st and 2nd and no outs, he would bunt Babe Ruth.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-01-2007, 12:07 PM
RacersEdge RacersEdge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Der Fristland
Posts: 5,393
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

I assumed:

.300 hitters

.7 chance of successful bunt

.6 chance of hit or SF

I got 64% and 65% chance of scoring 1 run for bunt/no bunt.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-01-2007, 12:08 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

Then he's a goddamn idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-01-2007, 12:35 PM
NickMPK NickMPK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,626
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

One of the few situations where I think a bunt is absolutely correct. But I am assuming that the 2 hitter is a competent bunter.

And I really have no idea what the stats are for successful sacrifice bunts. Generally, what % of attempted sacrifice bunt attempts fail? And what % result in infield hits?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-01-2007, 12:45 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: Settle this Baseball Argument

Umm... It seems that above average hitters should never bunt here.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.