Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2007, 04:56 AM
Jeff W Jeff W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,079
Default S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

Link

Scary...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2007, 08:50 AM
Perplexity Perplexity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 806
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

Less scary:

http://www.leggmason.com/funds/knowl...egy_011006.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2007, 09:25 AM
hawk59 hawk59 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,207
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

The payout ratio is also much lower, so it's not a fair comparison. The earnings yield is in line. This data shows how cheap stocks were in the late 70's, early 80's, but back then you could also buy Treasury bonds with yields in the teens.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2007, 10:43 AM
DcifrThs DcifrThs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Spewin them chips
Posts: 10,115
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

what exactly is damadoran (sp?) using for the calculation of "earnings yield" and "dividend yield" ?

what is that other think from legg mason (page 4) using to calculate "yield" of the S&P500?

it seems that the dividend yield decline is in conjunction with a decline in the overall use of dividends as a % of total payouts to shareholders. the two series are 94% correlated (though that doesn't dictate causality).

seems that everywhere you turn there is a different methodology for calculating earnings yield, dividend yield, and just plain old "yield"

i'd like to see total return for S&P 500 broken down into it's 3 components (cash, price change, dividends). i'd need to go to bloomberg for that...maybe i'll do it next time i go.

Barron
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-16-2007, 12:36 PM
Perplexity Perplexity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 806
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

wtf

the point is that many companies are doing share repurchases rather than paying dividends now

and share repurchases are basically equivalent
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-16-2007, 12:43 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

[ QUOTE ]
wtf

the point is that many companies are doing share repurchases rather than paying dividends now

and share repurchases are basically equivalent

[/ QUOTE ]
Share repurchases are more tax efficient for most investors, that's why they're more common now.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-16-2007, 12:51 PM
Tater10 Tater10 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 42.3827 -87.94149
Posts: 247
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

I'm missing the point. what is scary?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-16-2007, 12:58 PM
hawk59 hawk59 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,207
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wtf

the point is that many companies are doing share repurchases rather than paying dividends now

and share repurchases are basically equivalent

[/ QUOTE ]
Share repurchases are more tax efficient for most investors, that's why they're more common now.

[/ QUOTE ]

But if you own a company where they use a dollar to buy back a share that is worth less than a dollar then you'd probably rather have the dividend.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-16-2007, 02:32 PM
iversonian iversonian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 367
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

Since they reduced the tax rates on dividends in 2003, expect the payout ratio to continue to rise (as it has been doing recently).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-16-2007, 02:37 PM
Evan Evan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: startupping
Posts: 14,351
Default Re: S&P 500 Dividend Yield History

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wtf

the point is that many companies are doing share repurchases rather than paying dividends now

and share repurchases are basically equivalent

[/ QUOTE ]
Share repurchases are more tax efficient for most investors, that's why they're more common now.

[/ QUOTE ]

But if you own a company where they use a dollar to buy back a share that is worth less than a dollar then you'd probably rather have the dividend.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you saying they're buying back overvalued stock or they're somehow getting ripped off on the specific price they pay for it? If it's overvalued, wouldn't you just sell it? If it's overvalued and you know they're doing the buyback just wait until they do so and the stock price goes up, then sell it.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.