Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2007, 12:20 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crying bloody tears at 20/40
Posts: 4,504
Default Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

4h 30/60.

Some context that may or may not be useful: After 2-3 days of playing like a major lagtard I took a day off, but am now back to the tables. The 3 guys at the table are all very laggy and definitely push crappy hands too far, love to bluff, etc. (kinda like how I've been playing). In other words, because I'm a regular, they probably have notes on me as one of their own.

I've resolved that at this table, it makes sense to calm the [censored] down, play tight, wait for some good hands, and start punishing/trapping instead of getting into bluff wars. (Though a couple of sessions ago I pulled off an awesome turn cap, river-cap bluff where my opponent folded to the last bet on the river, I had a busted flush draw. So sweet! I *knew* the little bastard read me for having nothing . . . )

But anyway:

Folded to me, I raise in the SB with 33. Bluffy McVillain calls.

Flop is 667 rainbow. I bet, he raises. He could do this with a 7, an ace, a draw, complete air, or maybe even a '6'.

Options:

1)3bet, lead (any) turn.
2)Call, checkraise a non 8/9/A turn, otherwise call down.
3)Call, donk the turn (this could induce a value-bluff-raise on his part as lagtards hate being donked into).
4)Check/call down.

If he has air or a draw, villain will probably bluff the river a high percentage of the time unimproved unless he has an ace.

I didn't ponder it too deeply when the '9' hit on the turn, and I resorted to check/call mode, but I think I'd lean towards #2. This guy is super-bluffy, though, and there's a small chance he'd 3bet the turn as a bluff.

Against many I'd 3-bet the flop and lead, and that's probably the right line, but even if this guy is on a draw he'll take a free card, like, never. And I doubt he has an ace, or else he'd probably have repopped me preflop.

Opins?

PS -- Any line which includes "check/fold" or "bet/fold" in it I think needs to move to the bottom of the pile. Unless the turn and river are a 8 and then a 5, or my pair gets counterfeited.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-21-2007, 12:43 PM
MarkD MarkD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,396
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

If you 3-bet the flop, and lead the turn (2 or Q), how do you respond when villian raises?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2007, 12:55 PM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Folding for 1$/hand..
Posts: 6,890
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

If he is raising any gutshot, pair+ or ace, then you canīt fold. I dont think 3betting makes that much sense against someone who is willing to spew alot hu as it isnīt going to get him to fold the hands you want him to fold on the turn anyway.

If the turn is an 8-T I probably just check-fold. Otherwise check-call and probably check-call again on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2007, 01:00 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crying bloody tears at 20/40
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
If you 3-bet the flop, and lead the turn (2 or Q), how do you respond when villian raises?

[/ QUOTE ]

My reflex because I know how bluffy he is is to call down, which I think is wrong. I think that if it were a '2' I'd call down, which may be marginally wrong, and if it were a 'Q' I might call down, I might fold -- I'm 90% sure folding is the correct play.

My problem with 3-betting and leading the turn, and folding (if I fold), I've invested one small bet less than c/c'ing the whole way, and allowed him to possibly bluff me out. Also, if he has nothing but air, I've stopped inducing stupid bluffs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-21-2007, 01:52 PM
MarkD MarkD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,396
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
My problem with 3-betting and leading the turn, and folding (if I fold), I've invested one small bet less than c/c'ing the whole way, and allowed him to possibly bluff me out. Also, if he has nothing but air, I've stopped inducing stupid bluffs.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why I have pretty much removed that line from my game, but you play better than me so I wanted to get some insight as to how you would apply it as your original post lead me to believe you may be in favor of that line in this spot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-21-2007, 02:01 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crying bloody tears at 20/40
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My problem with 3-betting and leading the turn, and folding (if I fold), I've invested one small bet less than c/c'ing the whole way, and allowed him to possibly bluff me out. Also, if he has nothing but air, I've stopped inducing stupid bluffs.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why I have pretty much removed that line from my game, but you play better than me so I wanted to get some insight as to how you would apply it as your original post lead me to believe you may be in favor of that line in this spot.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a lot of players that will throw in a token flop raise here with overs or whatever, check the turn, and fold the river UI or maybe call with a weak ace if they just called in the BB with it. Or they might raise the flop, bet the turn UI, but then give up on the river reading me for a weak ace and figuring I'll call again.

Against those I might keep up the aggression, knowing that I can be counterfeited at any time, and want to get them out on the turn if possible, as they'll probably have 10 outs to beat me on the river.

Against laggier opponents that might read my flop 3bet as posturing, and who are much more likely to bet the river unimproved or cap the flop with their overs and gutshot (or 7, or 6, or god knows what else) I prefer a different get-to-showdown line.

Given that my opponents lately have been of the laggier variety, I don't do the flop 3bet/lead line that often, actually, as it's sooo easy to induce bluffs with these guys.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-21-2007, 04:23 PM
SteveL91 SteveL91 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 774
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

What about 3-betting the flop then c/c the turn/river if you've decided to get to showdown?

It has the advantages of getting in that third bet on the flop while you likely have the best hand, while avoiding more than 2BBs going in between the turn and river. It might also help setup future plays against similar guys (particularly if this hand gets to showdown) that'll allow you to 3bet the flop then C/R the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2007, 04:31 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crying bloody tears at 20/40
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

[ QUOTE ]
What about 3-betting the flop then c/c the turn/river if you've decided to get to showdown?

It has the advantages of getting in that third bet on the flop while you likely have the best hand, while avoiding more than 2BBs going in between the turn and river. It might also help setup future plays against similar guys (particularly if this hand gets to showdown) that'll allow you to 3bet the flop then C/R the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this is the worst of all possible worlds; they get to potentially see the river for free without any money going in on the turn, and the odd flop 3-bet, turn check may make even the most laggiest lag's eyebrows go up, making it much more unlikely he'll bet the turn with air.

It's odd enough to give a shot in some situation, though -- I think it might be more +EV in a situation where I had nothing but air and don't prefer a river check/call (possibly inducing a bluff) to a river bet.

Though if I was on a pure bluff I'd be more likely to 3bet the flop, lead the turn and river and pray he didn't play back at me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2007, 07:56 PM
wackjob wackjob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: >FTP
Posts: 3,637
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

a little off your topic, but do you really think there is something to be gained playing this hand versus this opponent when your villain has position on you? I think at best you are trying to squeeze a tiny profit from a really tough spot. perhaps i'm playing too many tables or my game is not up to par, but i'd just as soon fold preflop than take 33 or 22 up against a nasty villain who has position.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2007, 10:47 PM
sweetjazz sweetjazz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 3,700
Default Re: Blind war, small PP OOP against a LAG

Unless the opponent is very unreasonable, I think you should check/fold the turn when it comes a 9. You're probably way behind, and if not your opponent has at least 12 outs to beat you.

If he really 3 barrels air regularly, then I guess you have to just call down and pray, but things are looking bleak.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.